Skip to content

{bio}[foss/2019a] Reapr v1.0.18#9296

Merged
boegel merged 6 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
hrnagel:20191115132829_new_pr_Reapr1018
Aug 25, 2020
Merged

{bio}[foss/2019a] Reapr v1.0.18#9296
boegel merged 6 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
hrnagel:20191115132829_new_pr_Reapr1018

Conversation

@hrnagel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hrnagel hrnagel commented Nov 15, 2019

(created using eb --new-pr)

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/r/Reapr/Reapr-1.0.18-foss-2019a-Perl-5.28.1.eb Outdated
exts_defaultclass = 'PerlModule'

exts_list = [
('File::Spec::Link', '0.140', {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should add this to the Perl easyconfig instead?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BTW. I had to tell another user that needed "Palavras", how she could install the Perl libraries "DB_File" and "MLDBM::Sync" in her home-dir.

+++ Reapr_1.0.18/Makefile 2019-11-13 12:17:03.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+all:
+ cd third_party/tabix ; make
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tabix is provided by HTSlib, isn't adding that as a dependency a better alternative?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The problem is this line in src/Makefile:
TABIX = tabix/tabix.o -L./tabix -ltabix -lz
Neither the tabix easyconfig nor the HTSLib easyconfig allows linking with the static tabix library file that is created during compilation. I don't know why the Makefile also links with tabix.o.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@boegel thoughts on how to resolve this one?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I overlooked the explicit linking to tabix.o...

I can't think of a reason why that would be needed when also linking to -ltabix, but I guess this approach is the easiest way forward. It's not like tabix is a huge dependency, or that taking this approach would cause any major problems.

Plus, there's a whole bunch of (useful) patching going on here already, so not including this bit in the patch wouldn't prevent the need for a patch anyway.

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/r/Reapr/Reapr-1.0.18-cleanup.patch Outdated
@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Nov 15, 2019
@boegel boegel added the new label Nov 15, 2019
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Aug 25, 2020

(close/re-open to re-trigger CI tests and get a green light)

@boegel boegel closed this Aug 25, 2020
@boegel boegel reopened this Aug 25, 2020
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Aug 25, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2405.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (haswell), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/12f4a25a82193ce153c296ebbdcaf314 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Aug 25, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3406.kirlia.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240 CPU @ 2.60GHz (cascadelake), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/1f5a25b4faf09ef6d43a7f9eecbfed32 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Aug 25, 2020

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=9296 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_9296 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 5135

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 680175948 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
generoso-x-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/c01c28f84641af309a6903dc3a7d3543 for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Aug 25, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2405.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (haswell), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/880996487bd78fceb8327181ce83791d for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Aug 25, 2020

@hrnagel My apologies for not getting back to this earlier, it slipped between the cracks despite your quick response to the initial review...

It's good to go now, as soon as the test suite runs in CI give a green light I'll get this merged.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Aug 25, 2020

Going in, thanks @hrnagel!

@boegel boegel merged commit 6b58deb into easybuilders:develop Aug 25, 2020
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.3.0) Aug 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants