tweak is_patch_for function to make it more robust#4028
Merged
bartoldeman merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom Jun 17, 2022
Merged
tweak is_patch_for function to make it more robust#4028bartoldeman merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
bartoldeman merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adding a patch file to a PR via
--update-prwas sort of broken because theis_patch_forfunction wasn't robust enough.There were two problematic cases:
componentswas set toNone, which is the case forAOMPeasyconfigs because the custom easyblock forAOMPusesNoneas default value forcomponents:(see details below for traceback)
Details
%(namelower)sis used in the name of a patch file of an extension, like indd-0.5.6-foss-2020a-Python-3.8.2.eb:(see details below for traceback)
Details