Skip to content

Changes for Etherlink 6.3#423

Open
NicNomadic wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
[email protected]
Open

Changes for Etherlink 6.3#423
NicNomadic wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
[email protected]

Conversation

@NicNomadic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@NicNomadic NicNomadic commented Feb 20, 2026

Update the doc according to the 6.2 6.3 upgrade proposal.

NB: merge only when (and if) the proposal is voted successfully.

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Feb 20, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
docs-etherlink Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 18, 2026 9:10am

Request Review

@NicNomadic NicNomadic requested review from lthms and skenaja February 20, 2026 10:23
This change to the bridge introduces a breaking change in the events that are emitted as part of the bridging process.
The `deposit` event is now emitted by the [Tezos bridge precompiled contract](https://explorer.etherlink.com/address/0xff00000000000000000000000000000000000001) (`0xff0...0001`), not the null/system address.

For more information, see TODO BLOG POST.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind inserting the link

@NicNomadic NicNomadic changed the title Squashed changes for Etherlink 6.2 Changes for Etherlink 6.2 Feb 20, 2026
@rodibozman
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The rest lgtm w.r.t. Etherlink 6.2's changelog.

@rodibozman
Copy link
Copy Markdown

I can't resolve the threads but latest version looks good to me.


At the end of the period, if a proposal has enough voting power to meet a certain percentage of the total voting power, it moves to the next phase.
As of the Ebisu update, the leading proposal must gather support from at least 1% of the total voting power to move to the next phase.
As of Etherlink 6.2, the leading proposal must gather support from at least 1% of the total voting power to move to the next phase.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have to replace all 6.2 by (probably) 6.3, right?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done everywhere.

@NicNomadic NicNomadic changed the title Changes for Etherlink 6.2 Changes for Etherlink 6.3 Mar 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants