Skip to content

chore: remove assigning issues to creator #2026

Merged
MSevey merged 1 commit intomainfrom
marko/remove_assign_creator
Mar 3, 2025
Merged

chore: remove assigning issues to creator #2026
MSevey merged 1 commit intomainfrom
marko/remove_assign_creator

Conversation

@tac0turtle
Copy link
Contributor

@tac0turtle tac0turtle commented Mar 3, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Overview

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed the automation that automatically assigned issue creators to their issues. As a result, new issues will no longer have an automatic assignee, allowing for manual assignment as needed.

@tac0turtle tac0turtle requested a review from MSevey March 3, 2025 13:48
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This pull request removes the auto-add-assignee-label job from the GitHub Actions workflow defined in .github/workflows/housekeeping.yml. The removed job was responsible for automatically assigning the issue creator to new issues through a series of steps using the GitHub CLI and environment variable settings. With this change, the automatic assignment functionality is completely eliminated from the repository’s issue management process.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/housekeeping.yml Removed the auto-add-assignee-label job and its associated steps and environment variables.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the code garden where bugs once did hide,
I’ve hopped away a task with a joyful stride.
The auto-assign job is now out the door,
Freeing our workflow to explore even more.
With carrots and code, my heart leaps in delight!
🥕🐇

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0fbd148 and a66d81d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/housekeeping.yml (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/housekeeping.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: proto / proto-gen
  • GitHub Check: lint / markdown-lint
  • GitHub Check: lint / Lint CLI Docs
  • GitHub Check: test / Run Unit Tests
  • GitHub Check: Test CLI (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
  • GitHub Check: Summary

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RollkitBot RollkitBot requested review from a team, tuxcanfly and yarikbratashchuk and removed request for a team March 3, 2025 13:49
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 42.05%. Comparing base (0fbd148) to head (a66d81d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2026   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   42.05%   42.05%           
=======================================
  Files          80       80           
  Lines       12958    12958           
=======================================
  Hits         5449     5449           
  Misses       6783     6783           
  Partials      726      726

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@MSevey MSevey added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit e5856ef Mar 3, 2025
38 checks passed
@MSevey MSevey deleted the marko/remove_assign_creator branch March 3, 2025 15:25
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in Evolve Mar 3, 2025
@tac0turtle tac0turtle removed this from Evolve Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tuxcanfly tuxcanfly Awaiting requested review from tuxcanfly

@yarikbratashchuk yarikbratashchuk Awaiting requested review from yarikbratashchuk

1 more reviewer

@MSevey MSevey MSevey approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@tac0turtle tac0turtle

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tac0turtle @MSevey