Update article.md#3724
Conversation
Remove non-inclusive language.
|
Why. It's just a good metaphor here, it has nothing offensive in this technical context. Of course, it's just my opinion. |
|
First, I don't think it's time-consuming. I've already made the PR to fix it, I'm not asking your team to fix it. Second, I'm sorry if there's "too many small changes" for your liking. Perhaps you should remove the "Edit on GitHub" link from your sidebar if you no longer wish for people to contribute. Finally, I'm not going to open an entire DEI debate here. But I don't think it's a particularly "good metaphor" (The cross site request behaves just like a slur for a disabled person). I believe the language I suggested is perfectly descriptive and informative, and no nuance or meaning is lost. |
|
On second thought, I assume you mean "time-consuming" because the new phrasing will have to be translated into Spanish? If that's the problem I can ask a technical friend of mine who knows Javascript and speaks Spanish to make the change in that language, though it's unclear to me if such a change will be necessary (if the same non-inclusive language is used in Spanish for instance). |
|
Im sorry. As i said, i have no part in this repo. I get no money either, I do collaboration like you just did. the responsible team have NOTHING to do with my opinion. I just wanted to voice it. |
|
No worries! I'm not personally offended, I just think that using inclusive language helps grow our developer and Javascript communities in a healthy way. I hope that those reviewing this change will see it the same way. |
|
Im Not trying to make an excuse. The changes are merged in all languages. About the "inclusive" |
|
Thank you for your contribution! 🙂 @audiodude |
|
Thank you too! @joaquinelio |

Remove non-inclusive language.