Brought back web form into application flow#573
Merged
danielsjoo merged 8 commits intomasterfrom Feb 12, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…info used. also cleaned ui
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
requires server pr to be merged
Currently, keep.id doesn't actually fill forms. We had that route before but it was pretty buggy and with the new application flow, we don't use it anymore. Injected that step into the current workflow after "review" for application selection and "preview" for the completed application. Handled some bugs in the meantime like the route used the caseworker optional information instead of the client information (when filling out on behalf of a client).
To fit the "Apply" step, I did a little redesign of the breadcrumbs. That wouldn't be hard to revert but it does become broken without it.
Some of these screenshots don't show much autofilled because the annotations are lacking (see server pr)
closes #558
closes #562