Revert explicit linestyle kwarg on step()#11211
Merged
dstansby merged 1 commit intomatplotlib:masterfrom May 10, 2018
Merged
Conversation
jklymak
approved these changes
May 9, 2018
anntzer
reviewed
May 9, 2018
| raise ValueError("'where' argument to step must be " | ||
| "'pre', 'post' or 'mid'") | ||
| kwargs['linestyle'] = 'steps-' + where + linestyle | ||
| kwargs['linestyle'] = 'steps-' + where + kwargs.get('linestyle', '') |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
...he's overwriting the same kwarg...
dstansby
approved these changes
May 10, 2018
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Summary
This is a selective revert of #11145 for the kwarg 'linestyle' of
step().The intention of #11145 is making relevant kwargs explicit by removing popping from kwargs.
The case here is different. 'linestyle' belongs to a whole set of style parameters that we do not explicitly state. It's not special from a signature point of view and thus should not be listed explicitly. The popping in the code is done for internal rewriting reasons.