DOC: better cross referencing for animations#28517
Merged
story645 merged 1 commit intomatplotlib:mainfrom Jul 7, 2024
Merged
Conversation
story645
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2024
story645
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2024
meeseeksmachine
pushed a commit
to meeseeksmachine/matplotlib
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2024
meeseeksmachine
pushed a commit
to meeseeksmachine/matplotlib
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2024
rcomer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2024
…517-on-v3.9.1-doc Backport PR #28517 on branch v3.9.1-doc (DOC: better cross referencing for animations)
rcomer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2024
…517-on-v3.9.x Backport PR #28517 on branch v3.9.x (DOC: better cross referencing for animations)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR summary
Looking up animations today and noted that the API and the user docs have pretty divergent material. Probably should be harmonized, but at least crosslink for now...