Conversation
|
You should also have a look at the |
|
Big question first, do you think this needs a MEP? I started writing this as an issue and then it became rather long, so I thought I should convert it. Looking at the scipy sprint I think we need to outline the direction, perhaps with some branches to show proof of concepts. I took a look a brief look at #3944, a bit confused as to the difference between a What timescale did you have in mind for this? I see you marked this as "proposed next point release", does that relate to the MEP doc, or the code itself? I imagine you don't want to get bothered with code now just two weeks before release as I imagine you have a lot of other stuff to work on. I find it hard enough just keeping up with all the notifications, every time I check this last day I see another 30 new notifications, so I thought twice about posting this PR, but as an MEP discussion document I thought it could simply go on the table for a few weeks. |
|
On 2015/07/14 8:48 AM, OceanWolf wrote:
Collections are for multiple objects that are very similar; they are Containers are for different types of object that combine to make a |
|
Does matplotlib have a list of both ancestor and descendant classes, especially the latter? Something like this which lists the subclasses? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think all of our rst files should use hard returns to keep line lengths reasonable. I haven't checked, but I assume this has been done in the past.
|
Not even clear we are doing MEPs anymore. I'll close but feel free to reopen if this is still being pushed somewhere... |
Something perhaps for 2.1. Something I can work on after MEP27 😉.