[purs ide] Extracts documentation comments for type classes#3856
Merged
kritzcreek merged 2 commits intopurescript:masterfrom Apr 26, 2020
Merged
[purs ide] Extracts documentation comments for type classes#3856kritzcreek merged 2 commits intopurescript:masterfrom
kritzcreek merged 2 commits intopurescript:masterfrom
Conversation
I had assumed we were already doing this? Maybe something about the Name structure changed.
Member
Author
|
Thanks! |
Closed
hdgarrood
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2020
* [purs ide] Extracts documentation comments for type classes I had assumed we were already doing this? Maybe something about the Name structure changed. * [purs ide] Extracts documentation comments for type class members
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I had assumed we were already doing this? Maybe something about the Name structure changed, or this was just an oversight in the original PR. I also added a test to make sure it doesn't regress.