Security Controls Implementation β’ System Hardening β’ Asset Control β’ Logging & SIEM β’ Cloud Baselines β’ Encryption β’ Backup Validation β’ Incident Response
A structured, execution-first 30-lab portfolio implementing CIS-style baseline controls across endpoints, networks, and cloud systems β with reproducible steps, validation evidence, and documentation artifacts.
Progression: inventory β hardening β monitoring β access control β SIEM β cloud security β encryption β backup verification β IR
This repository demonstrates hands-on implementation of CIS-aligned defensive security controls across 30 structured labs.
It showcases practical capability in:
- Asset inventory & exposure validation (hardware/software reconciliation)
- Vulnerability scanning & remediation tracking (OpenVAS)
- Least-privilege enforcement & access governance
- Endpoint & network hardening (Linux + Windows)
- Firewall & boundary defense (UFW, iptables)
- Log monitoring & SIEM integration (ELK, Wazuh)
- Encryption at rest (BitLocker, LUKS) and in transit (TLS/HTTPS)
- Backup, restore & integrity validation (diff + hashing)
- Incident response lifecycle documentation & containment concepts
- Cloud instance hardening (OpenStack security groups)
This is execution-first security engineering: commands are run, outputs validated, controls tested, and evidence documented per lab.
The portfolio reflects practical defensive operations aligned with real-world SOC environments β not theoretical exercises.
This is a structured 30-lab security engineering program focused on implementing foundational and operational defensive controls across:
- Endpoint security
- Network hardening
- Identity & access governance
- Logging & SIEM workflows
- Encryption enforcement
- Backup validation
- Cloud security configuration
- Incident response process execution
All labs were executed in controlled Ubuntu and Windows lab environments using open-source tooling.
Each lab includes:
- Command execution steps
- Validation outputs
- Configuration artifacts (sanitized)
- Structured documentation
- Troubleshooting notes
The progression moves from baseline controls (inventory, hardening, firewalling) to operational security (SIEM integration, encryption verification, policy enforcement).
This portfolio is designed for:
- SOC Analyst (Tier 1 / Tier 2) roles
- Blue Team & Defensive Security learners
- System / Endpoint Hardening engineers
- Junior Detection Engineering candidates
- IT professionals transitioning into cybersecurity
- Recruiters evaluating hands-on defensive capability
It demonstrates the ability to implement, validate, and document real security controls β not just describe them.
Click any lab title to jump directly to its folder.
| Lab | Title | Focus Area |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Hardware Asset Inventory | Asset discovery & reconciliation |
| 02 | Software Asset Inventory | Installed software auditing |
| 03 | Basic Vulnerability Scanning | OpenVAS / GVM scanning |
| 04 | Controlled Admin Privileges | Least privilege enforcement |
| 05 | Secure Endpoint Configuration | CIS-style hardening |
| 06 | Audit Log Monitoring & Analysis | Log triage workflow |
| 07 | Email & Browser Hardening | Anti-phishing controls |
| 08 | Malware Defenses | ClamAV validation |
| 09 | Limiting Ports & Services | UFW + iptables enforcement |
| 10 | Data Recovery Capabilities | Backup + restore + diff validation |
| 11 | Network Device Hardening | SSH-only management |
| 12 | Boundary Defense | Inbound filtering + nc validation |
| 13 | Data Protection Basics | TLS + file encryption |
| 14 | Need-to-Know Access Control | Linux groups & permissions |
| 15 | Wireless Access Control | WPA2 AES + WPS disable |
- Hardware/software asset reconciliation
- Nmap host discovery validation
- OpenVAS vulnerability triage
- Admin privilege auditing (sudo/wheel)
- CIS-style endpoint hardening mindset
- UFW & iptables rule enforcement
- Port/service minimization
- Backup automation (cron) + integrity validation (diff)
- Router hardening (SSH-only, disable HTTP)
- TLS certificate configuration + handshake validation
- File encryption validation (AES-256)
- Linux access control (chmod/chown/groups)
- Wireless security hardening
These labs implement foundational baseline controls across endpoints and networks using open-source tooling and validation workflows.
| Lab | Title | Focus Area |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Account Monitoring & Control | UID auditing + lockout policy |
| 17 | Security Awareness Training | Phishing defense training |
| 18 | Application Software Security | SQLi/XSS mitigation |
| 19 | Incident Response & Management | IR lifecycle |
| 20 | Penetration Testing (Authorized) | Nmap + remediation workflow |
| 21 | Patch Management Basics | Update validation |
| 22 | Hardening Windows System | Policy enforcement |
| 23 | Hardening Linux System | SSH hardening |
| 24 | SIEM Log Integration (ELK) | Filebeat β Elasticsearch |
| 25 | Secure Cloud Instance | OpenStack security groups |
| 26 | Endpoint Security Tool Intro | Wazuh alert validation |
| 27 | Data at Rest Encryption | BitLocker + LUKS |
| 28 | Data in Transit Encryption | Nginx TLS + redirect |
| 29 | Verifying Backups | Hash + diff validation |
| 30 | Strengthening Password Policies | pwquality + Windows policy |
- Account auditing & session timeout enforcement
- PAM-based lockout configuration
- Security awareness content development
- SQL injection & XSS mitigation strategies
- Incident lifecycle execution (Detect β Contain β Recover)
- Patch deployment & validation workflows
- SSH hardening & service minimization
- ELK + Filebeat log shipping
- Wazuh endpoint monitoring validation (EICAR)
- OpenStack cloud security groups
- BitLocker + LUKS encryption
- HTTPS enforcement (301 redirect)
- Backup integrity validation (sha256sum)
- Password complexity & expiration enforcement
These labs expand from baseline hardening into operational SOC controls and encryption validation workflows.
Across labs, validation is explicitly demonstrated with:
- Before/after checks (ports, services, policies, configs)
- Negative tests (unauthorized access fails, blocked ports time out)
- Integrity proof (diff output, SHA256 hashes)
- Security telemetry proof (auth logs, SIEM indexes, Wazuh alerts)
- TLS proof (
curl -I, handshake/cipher confirmation)
Click to expand
- Ubuntu 24.04/24.04.1 LTS (primary lab host)
- Windows (inventory exports, policies, encryption tooling)
nmap,ss,netstat(net-tools),ip,ip route,nc(netcat)
- OpenVAS / Greenbone (GVM)
- Lynis (baseline auditing approach)
- ClamAV (
freshclam,clamscan)
ufw,iptables(+ save/restore)- Service management:
systemctl
rsyslog,/var/log/auth.log,grep,tail- Elastic Stack: Elasticsearch + Kibana
- Filebeat (log shipper)
- Wazuh (manager/dashboard; endpoint alert validation)
tar,gzip,cron,crontab,diff,sha256sum
- OpenSSH (SSH hardening)
- Apache2 TLS (OpenSSL cert generation + TLS handshake validation)
- Nginx TLS (HTTPS + redirect)
- BitLocker (Windows), LUKS / cryptsetup (Linux)
- Windows utilities: 7-Zip AES-256, VeraCrypt
- OpenStack (Horizon + CLI)
- Security groups (restrictive ingress rules)
- MFA workflow enforcement
This repository is organized as a 30-lab defensive controls portfolio:
CIS-Top-20-Controls/
ββ πΉ Security Foundations (Labs 1β15)
ββ πΉ Security Hardening, Operations & Encryption (Labs 16β30)
ββ README.md
Track Overview
- Labs 1β15: Security Foundations (inventory, hardening, logging, boundary defense, encryption, access control)
- Labs 16β30: Operations & Enforcement (identity controls, patching, SIEM, cloud security, encryption validation, backup assurance)
Each lab follows a consistent, GitHub-ready structure:
labXX-lab-name/
βββ README.md # Objectives, steps, validation checklist
βββ commands.sh # Executed commands (copy/paste runnable where applicable)
βββ output.txt # Sanitized outputs (proof of validation)
βββ reports/ # Findings, policies, configs, verification notes
βββ troubleshooting.md # Common issues + fixes
βββ interview_qna.md # (optional) interview-ready questions & answers
This structure ensures reproducibility, evidence capture, and portfolio-grade documentation across all labs.
After completing all 30 labs, this portfolio demonstrates the ability to:
- Build and reconcile hardware & software asset inventories with discovery validation
- Perform vulnerability scanning and document remediation priorities (OpenVAS/GVM)
- Enforce least privilege (admin access governance + need-to-know access models)
- Harden Linux and Windows systems using baseline security standards
- Implement deny-by-default firewall and boundary defense controls (UFW/iptables)
- Enable logging, perform log triage, and integrate events into SIEM workflows (ELK/Wazuh)
- Configure and validate encryption controls (BitLocker, LUKS, TLS/HTTPS)
- Design and test backup, restore, and integrity verification workflows (diff + hashes)
- Apply patch management and password/account policy enforcement
- Execute documented incident response containment and recovery steps
- Secure cloud instances by designing restrictive security group rules (OpenStack)
This is practical implementation β not theoretical configuration summaries.
These labs are designed to mirror defensive security work performed in production environments:
- CIS-style baseline security control implementation and validation
- SOC visibility workflows: log collection β triage β alert thresholds
- Access governance: admin privilege control and need-to-know enforcement
- Boundary defense: firewalling, exposure reduction, and verification testing
- Encryption enforcement to meet data protection and compliance requirements
- Recovery assurance through backup verification and integrity checks
- Cloud hardening using least-exposure network security groups
- Incident readiness through documented response workflows and containment actions
All labs were executed in controlled lab environments using open-source tooling.
This portfolio reflects capability aligned with:
- SOC Analyst (Tier 1 / Tier 2)
- Blue Team & Defensive Security roles
- System / Endpoint Hardening Engineer
- Security Operations Engineer
- Junior Security Administrator
It demonstrates:
- Security-first, validation-driven mindset
- Strong documentation and evidence discipline
- Practical implementation of baseline controls across OS, network, and cloud layers
- Repeatable verification workflows (ports, logs, backups, encryption behavior)
All labs were executed in controlled environments and designed to simulate realistic defensive security operations workflows:
- Asset visibility & exposure management (inventory + scanning + reconciliation)
- Hardening & secure configuration enforcement (services, policies, SSH, Windows controls)
- Monitoring & detection readiness (audit logs, SIEM shipping, alert validation)
- Boundary defense verification (deny-by-default, allowed service checks, blocked port tests)
- Data protection enforcement (BitLocker/LUKS + TLS configuration + HTTPS redirects)
- Recovery assurance (backup restore validation with diff + hash verification)
- Cloud security baselining (restrictive security groups, removal of overly broad rules)
- Incident readiness execution (containment concepts + lifecycle documentation)
This repository represents operational defensive controls implementation β not theoretical notes.
This heatmap reflects hands-on defensive controls implementation across 30 labs in:
Asset Governance β’ System Hardening β’ Access Control β’ Logging & SIEM β’ Encryption β’ Cloud Security β’ Recovery Assurance β’ Incident Readiness
Exposure bars represent depth of practical implementation and validation.
| Skill Area | Exposure Level | Practical Depth | Tools / Technologies Used |
|---|---|---|---|
| π Asset Inventory & Discovery | ββββββββββ 100% | HW/SW inventory, Nmap reconciliation, exposure validation | nmap, dpkg-query, WMIC |
| π Vulnerability Scanning | ββββββββββ 90% | OpenVAS scanning, severity review, remediation documentation | OpenVAS / GVM |
| π₯ Least Privilege & Access Control | ββββββββββ 100% | sudo governance, group-based ACLs, permission validation | sudo, chmod, chown, PAM |
| π₯ Endpoint Hardening (Linux) | ββββββββββ 100% | Service minimization, SSH hardening, baseline enforcement | systemctl, Lynis |
| πͺ Endpoint Hardening (Windows) | ββββββββββ 90% | Policy enforcement, feature reduction, password controls | Local Security Policy |
| π₯ Firewall & Boundary Defense | ββββββββββ 100% | Deny-by-default, rule validation, blocked port testing | UFW, iptables, nc |
| π Logging & Audit Monitoring | ββββββββββ 90% | Auth log triage, suspicious pattern filtering | rsyslog, grep |
| π‘ SIEM Integration | ββββββββββ 90% | Log shipping, index validation, alert rule testing | ELK, Filebeat, Wazuh |
| βοΈ Cloud Security Baselines | ββββββββββ 80% | Restrictive security groups, exposure reduction | OpenStack |
| π Encryption (Data at Rest) | ββββββββββ 90% | BitLocker, LUKS configuration + reboot validation | BitLocker, cryptsetup |
| π Encryption (Data in Transit) | ββββββββββ 90% | TLS config, HTTPS enforcement, redirect validation | Apache, Nginx, OpenSSL |
| πΎ Backup & Recovery Assurance | ββββββββββ 100% | tar backups, restore validation, diff + hash integrity checks | tar, diff, sha256sum |
| π Patch & Policy Enforcement | ββββββββββ 90% | OS updates, password complexity, expiration validation | apt, Windows Update |
| π¨ Incident Response Readiness | ββββββββββ 80% | IR phase documentation, containment concepts | ClamAV, firewall controls |
- ββββββββββ = Implemented end-to-end with validation & documented evidence
- ββββββββββ = Strong working implementation with practical verification
- ββββββββββ = Functional exposure with applied context
This heatmap reflects operational defensive capability, not isolated configuration steps β covering:
Inventory β Hardening β Monitoring β Access Control β SIEM β Cloud β Encryption β Recovery β Incident Readiness
# Clone repository
git clone https://github.com/abdul4rehman215/CIS-Top-20-Controls.git
cd CIS-Top-20-Controls
# Open any lab
cd labXX-name
# Review documentation
cat README.md
# Execute commands (if applicable)
bash commands.sh
# Review outputs / reports
cat output.txtEach lab is self-contained and follows a structured defensive workflow:
- Objective β What control is being implemented
- Implementation β Commands & configuration steps
- Validation β Proof via logs, port checks, policy enforcement, encryption behavior, or restore testing
- Artifacts β Config snippets, reports, sanitized outputs
- Troubleshooting Notes β Operational considerations
labXX-name/
β
βββ README.md
βββ commands.sh (or documented command blocks)
βββ output.txt (sanitized validation outputs)
βββ reports/
βββ troubleshooting.md
This repository is designed to be:
- π Educational (defensive security training)
- π Validation-focused (controls are tested, not just configured)
- π‘οΈ Aligned with CIS-style baseline implementation
- π Interview-ready (clear evidence of hands-on execution)
All 30 labs were executed in controlled lab environments designed to simulate real defensive security operations.
- Ubuntu 24.04 LTS (primary lab host)
- Windows 11 Pro (policy, encryption, and endpoint testing)
- OpenStack cloud instances (security group & exposure control testing)
- Open-source security tooling (OpenVAS, Lynis, ELK, Wazuh, ClamAV, UFW, iptables)
- Segmented test networks for firewall and boundary validation
- Local TLS/HTTPS deployments for encryption verification
- Backup and restore simulations using non-production datasets
Controls were not only configured β they were validated through:
- Port verification tests
- Log generation & SIEM indexing checks
- Encryption behavior validation (reboot + access tests)
- Backup restore + integrity comparisons (diff + sha256sum)
This portfolio reflects implementation + verification, not configuration alone.
This repository is designed to support:
- Defensive security training
- SOC operations skill development
- System & endpoint hardening practice
- Secure configuration validation workflows
- Encryption and recovery assurance testing
- Cloud baseline security implementation
- Incident response documentation exercises
All techniques are demonstrated strictly within authorized lab environments and are intended for defensive security improvement.
All research, simulations, and security control testing in this repository were conducted:
- In isolated, authorized lab environments
- Against self-configured or intentionally vulnerable systems
- Using synthetic or non-sensitive datasets
- For educational and professional defensive development purposes
No production systems were targeted. No unauthorized access was performed.
The techniques demonstrated are intended solely for responsible defensive security implementation and training.
This repository reflects real, execution-first defensive security work β not theoretical configuration notes.
It demonstrates the ability to implement and validate controls across the full defensive lifecycle:
Inventory β Hardening β Access Control β Monitoring β SIEM β Encryption β Recovery β Enforcement
Security engineering is not just configuration.
It is control implementation + validation + repeatability. π‘οΈ
If this portfolio adds value, consider starring β the repository.
Abdul Rehman
Defensive Security β’ SOC Operations β’ System Hardening β’ SIEM β’ Cloud Baselines β’ Encryption Controls