tyler to Python · 1 year agoO(no) You Didn’tmrshiny608.github.ioexternal-linkmessage-square3linkfedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down10 cross-posted to: programminggolangprogrammingcirclejerk[email protected]
arrow-up119arrow-down1external-linkO(no) You Didn’tmrshiny608.github.iotyler to Python · 1 year agomessage-square3linkfedilink cross-posted to: programminggolangprogrammingcirclejerk[email protected]
minus-squareFizzyOrangelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoTL;DR, big-O ignores the constant factor. If you already know what that means you don’t need to read this…
minus-squareduckythescientist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoEh, I also enjoyed seeing the comparison between Go and Python, seeing the jumps in time because of allocations, and knowing the size of the list when the more efficient algorithm started to become faster.
TL;DR, big-O ignores the constant factor. If you already know what that means you don’t need to read this…
Eh, I also enjoyed seeing the comparison between Go and Python, seeing the jumps in time because of allocations, and knowing the size of the list when the more efficient algorithm started to become faster.