I just started thinking about it. Why is space exploration even that necessary? They’re spending so much money on it when we have so much problems in our own planet…

  • dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    16 days ago

    Necessary? No. Not much except eating, drinking and breathing is. Even reproduction is optional from the view of a single individual.

    A good idea? Absolutely:

    1. Exploring space tells us a lot about earth. We currently assume that the moon formed when something big collided with earth and threw lots of material into a stable orbit. This means moon is probably made of the same materials as earth and because there is no erosion nor tectonic activity on the moon, it lets us study what earth may have looked like billions of years ago.
    2. Lots and lots of things that were originally developed for space are very useful on earth: teflon coating, memory foam matresses, efficient solar panels and many more. Sure, they could have been developed without space exploration but the pressure to get something exactly right helped a lot. And of course we directly use satellites for a lot of earth stuff, too. Think tv, weather prediction, monitoring of climate change, communication, GPS, accurate maps and many more.
    3. It gives humanity something to unite behind. Even during the cold war, the USA and the Soviet Union ignored their feud for a bit to make Apollo-Soyuz happen. These days, the ISS is one of the biggest multinational projects and I dread the day it gets decommissioned because Russia will have one less reason to talk to the rest of the world.
  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    16 days ago

    The impact to society from space exploration is immense if not immeasurable.

    • Weather forecasting
    • GPS navigation
    • Earth sciences
    • Robotics
    • Medical imaging

    NASA has a website dedicated to the topic, as do other agencies around the world.

    There’s also a Wikipedia page on the topic:

    • bl4kers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      The ingenuity and innovation required to make space travel possible (and efficient) is remarkable. Definitely falls into the category of “it’s not the destination, it’s the journey.” It’s important to continue challenging ourselves as a species.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    16 days ago

    All attempts to discover how the universe works benefits us. Even a lot of really esoteric stuff has proven useful in fields like medicine and civil engineering.

    Honestly if we can pivot our high tech innovation efforts from being mainly driven by military to being driven by basic research (basic in this case meaning researching the natural world directly without any particular goal other than learning), we’d be a lot better off.

  • arthur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    15 days ago

    Let me rewrite your question, and correct me if I’m misrepresenting it:

    “Why should we spend resources on X instead of Y?”

    Well, for this kind of question, I would prefer to choose a “high value” X and an “important” Y.

    Space exploration, and science as a whole, is extremely cheap and good for humanity.

    Let’s talk about other expensive “X” first:

    • Unnecessary war efforts.
    • ICE (if we are taking about US)
    • Saving banks when they screw up on their bets.
    • Incentives to coal and gas when solar is already more viable …

    Maybe you started to think about it because that’s an amazing subject, and it is. That alone should be reason enough for us to want to do it. But it is not the only reason. Space exploration already gave us a lot of tech we rely on today. And still, is a very difficult field that will require more tech advancements, that will benefit us in the future.

  • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    16 days ago

    Necessary, yes. Furthering our knowledge of the cosmos is a worthwhile pursuit for its own sake. That being said, the sudden focus on NASA is pure political distraction, a clumsy attempt to foment nationalism that isn’t going to be as effective as its architects were hoping.

    • Ænima@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      a clumsy attempt to foment nationalism that isn’t going to be as effective as its architects were hoping.

      It could have been effective if the lead up to the NASA push had lent itself to any hope of cooperation within our govt. As it stands, it just feels like a way for the ultra-wealthy to advance their commercial space interests through taxpayer funding.

  • fixmycode@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    16 days ago

    yes. there’s two branching discussions here:

    • Space as a scientific topic, it needs to be understood. Our observation of reality is very local, and although we can prove that some of our assumptions about physics, life and civilization work on our neighborhood, it doesn’t mean that they’re the same everywhere. That alone is sufficient reason for me, to explore.
    • Space as the new frontier. Many if not all exploration done on planet Earth has been, in some shape or form, resource-motivated. Lands, food, medicine, minerals, routes, are all found through exploration and normally through people spending money looking for a return over investment. Space is no different.

    I think the interesting part is where this two branches touch: If we ever plan on capturing an asteroid for mining, the technology needs to be there to do it, and hopefully the technology is about the benefit of all humankind. This kind of development is showing us the way to move forward and solve problems. Imagine a world when we don’t need to destroy ecosystems in order to get iron because all iron comes from off-world.

    • astutemural@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      I used to think this, but here’s the problem: new resources to extract mean absolutely fuck all under the current global paradigm.

      There’s enough iron out there to make several tons of it available to every human in existence for whatever they need or want to do. Will that happen? No. It’s not profitable for the owner class to do that. Instead, they will fight amongst themselves until someone has an effective monopoly on asteroid mining, and then limit the supply so they can generate maximal profit (De Beers, anyone?)

      We have the capability, right now, to feed everyone on Earth. To clothe everyone. To house everyone. We don’t. Any resources out there that we might find useful will be gated behind the same greedy, psychopathic group of leeches that currently control everything else.

      The planet isn’t being destroyed because we had no choice. The planet is being destroyed so a bunch of MBAs could show off a nice graph at the quaterly meeting. It is very much delibrate. Any resource extraction in space will solely be done in that it is more profitable than doing it on Earth, climate be damned. We need to fix that problem before asteroid mining for the good of Earth and humanity is even an option.

      • ultranaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        If we could get resources from space without having to extract them on earth that seems inherently better even if the same MBA shitheads are running the space mines. It would make it a lot easier to prohibit harmful resource extraction methods if they can also be economically accomplished without having to destroy irreplaceable ecosystems, for example.

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 days ago

    Yes, but capitalists should not do it. And actually space exploration on today’s scale cost literal pennies compared to military or shareholders loot.

  • diablexical@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 days ago

    Yes. For those who consider it wasteful spending, consider that a lot of problems are not fixable by just throwing more money at them. There’s a saying that “9 women can’t make a baby in one month” even though 1 woman can in 9. Many ills of society are as much about political/social motivation, entrenched opponents/regulatory capture, NIMBYism, etc and not problems that you can fix just by spending more. There’s also the concept of a “marginal dollar” - spending one more dollar in an important area that already has a lot of money (and has problems that aren’t really addressed by just having more money) may not be as impactful as a less important area where that dollar would go a lot further.

  • Vupware@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    Absolutely and unequivocally yes. Nothing should constrain the boundaries of scientific study in space, especially now that our years are numbered due to climate change and dumbass fascists and dictators with launch codes. Whities on the moon, while a noble and valuable sentiment, should be altered to whities on patrol or something.

    I’m so sick and tired of seeing Americans bitch about space exploration colonialism and remain silent on the colonialism that continues to kill and exploit Innocent people across the world.

    Yes, we need better social infrastructure desperately, but that should come at the cost of terrestrial imperialism, not space exploration.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 days ago

    Looking at the list of government expenditures, I don’t see space exploration as problematic as other things we are spending money on.

  • mlc894@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 days ago

    The point is the advancement of science, not simply the travel itself. Space science is integral to many advances we take for granted these days.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    16 days ago

    Yes, we need to do things like space exploration because these are the endeavours that advance humanity. Even in practical terms, plenty of discoveries that are useful here come from technologies developed for space exploration. If you’re really worried about unproductive use of resouces, maybe worry about how we deal with the pedo elites that rule over us and hoard resources on unimaginable scale.

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      But we need pedo billionaires as test pilots for stress testing experimental rocket designs :((

  • Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    15 days ago

    The word necessary has a lot of wiggle room here. What are necessities? Going by the bare minimum:

    • food
    • water
    • protection from the elements
    • protection from illness/infection
    • continuation of the species

    That’s about everything we truly ‘need’ to die of old age and not go extinct. Nearly everything people currently do is a subset of those needs. Space exploration can be marked under both protection from the elements and continuation of the species.