AI agents MUST NOT add Signed-off-by tags. Only humans can legally certify the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO). The human submitter is responsible for:
- Reviewing all AI-generated code
- Ensuring compliance with licensing requirements
- Adding their own Signed-off-by tag to certify the DCO
- Taking full responsibility for the contribution
That’s fair. Nobody has to know you wrote it with a not, that’s impossible to detect, but you have to own it and be ready for the discussions that follow.
Given that nobody is able to guarantee that code used for training was used according to it’s license, this means no hallucinated code in Linux. Nice.
Rule-wise, this seems fair.
Regardless, if AI usage continues to increase in this manner, I’ll likely be driving NetBSD, AROS, and FreeDOS by the end of the decade.
Maybe even a little TempleOS or ZealOS, for flavour.
RedoxOS has a no-LLM policy: https://gitlab.redox-os.org/redox-os/redox/-/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#ai-policy
It’s just regarding labeling. It’s unenforcable to have a project “clean” of AI.
It’s just regarding labeling.
No, it’s not: https://old.reddit.com/r/Redox/comments/1rp57nq/redox_os_has_adopted_a_certificate_of_origin/o9ixfu9/?context=1
deleted by creator
It really has come a long way in a relatively very short time in terms of quality and, well, shitting under the rug
