Probably because you were driving for a few hours. That makes sense. You may not feel it but driving is an active task that takes more effort than just sitting in a chair.

I would much rather have this system have false positives rather than not have it at all.

You are right. Because the law says nothing about the requirements. They haven’t decided on them yet. Come back when they propose something.

What about their proposed solution requires any of this data to leave the vehicle?

That’s the thing from the article they linked to. NHTSA says the tech does not exist yet, hence why they are asking for an extension.

Last year I drove my parent’s car which is equipped with one of these cameras that determine if the driver is distracted or dozing. And I can say for certain that it works. I honestly wish that my car had this sort of a system.

I view this tech like a padlock. Sure some people will do whatever they can to get around it, but it keeps honest people honest. If it can reduce deaths on the road from drunk and tired drivers even by a little bit then isn’t that worth it?

I’m not sure what you mean by not being able to follow up… Driving drunk and killing someone is already punished harshly, and you can even follow up civilly; it’s called a wrongful death suit.

Is it the bright headlights or the abundance of trucks raised so high that the headlights beam directly into your eyeballs…

Both. It’s both.

Does voyager actually support saved comments? Boost still only shows saved posts despite letting you save comments.

And that’s why I don’t connect my personal devices to the corporate network, because I know what we can see.

Again I would like to avoid poverty in a market where I am very unlikely to get a “non-evil” job. I don’t want to keep trying to justify my position as I have already made myself a pariah. so I will just leave this here and encourage people in similar positions to read it. https://www.cia.gov/static/5c875f3ec660e092cf893f60b4a288df/SimpleSabotage.pdf

I would argue no. Partly because I am in a similar situation. But also because I would be a fool to quit such a stable, laid back job in a market where it is extremely difficult to find a job in my field.

Granted I also do care. But not enough to risk poverty.

You know I saw that device before and was interested. I think one reason people might like this better is due to the hackability but it sounds like the xteink is fairly hackable too (and probably has better long term support).

Personally I am still trying to go back to physical books before I try another e-reader.

The main point of the device is to be tiny so you can just have it in your pocket. Hopefully, encouraging you to read more by lowering the barrier to start.

Though I am sure this device is not meant for everyone.

Strange I guess I am not aware of any distros that come with network drives pre-configured. But either way that would be a configuration error on the distro’s side then. Waiting for a network share to be available is actually a feature to many.

Say for instance you had critical data on the network share then you might not want to boot if that is not available. And if you don’t then you might mark the share as nobootwait.

Without knowing what the configuration on this specific drive you are having trouble with I really could not say what is wrong.

If you are having those issues with booting maybe it is because you configured your network share incorrectly? If you are waiting on shutdown timeouts for something then just go edit the timeout. systemctl edit <stuck thing>.

Typically when I crawl through journald it is to diagnose a problem with a specific application. Actually, the fact that those logs are easily accessible in a centralized place with easy to understand commands to access them is a reason why systemd (or more specifically systemd-journald) is so great.

The only times that I have had major issues like that was either because (A) I misconfigured something or (B) a package came misconfigured.

Not saying this will solve your issue. But you might also want to check dmesg logs. Since this has to do with hardware it could be driver issues and those might not show up in journal. Especially since it has to do with USB.

Quick someone share the dns haiku.

Do you have a source on the udev thing? I have not heard of this.

Were you looking at man systemd.timer? Pretty much everything you need is on there and it is not too complicated.

That law just says “A person that violates this title[…]”. Which is vague. But it appears to me that this would include the parent.

It is also something that only athe AG can bring charges for. This won’t be something that police are getting out their ticket books for. And if we don’t like how the AG is handling it, we can try to recall them.

there’s not a system in place to assign them responsibility regarding the child accessing places it should not (if we do really think they should not).

That’s what this law does. It provides a system (age attestation) and penalties for violating it.