No? Things just will exist once they are discovered. Once nuclear warheads were discovered, there was no going back. Once the internet was established, it was going to be around. Same goes for a million other things. And now it applies to AI as well. Even if every big tech fascist stopped making AI, it is still going to be around, and it will be used maliciously. Our best bet is to use it defensibly before it can be used against us.
So you code strictly in assembly? If you do, good for you. If you don’t, the I can’t believe you would intentional deskill yourself.
Occasional jokes in a topic filled with mostly serious answers is not problematic, especially ones that aren’t at the expense of anyone else. I think the joke was appropriate. Especially on a platform that is lucky to get 30+ comments on a post, it being top comment is not going to overshadow the others. Most people can read all of the comments in a few minutes anyway.
That’s rough… I wouldn’t want to be British
I tend to agree, but if they are only making it illegal for the population that isn’t addicted, not many are going to go out of their way to get black market tobacco and become addicted. It isn’t a prohibition for those already sucked in by big tobacco, which would 100% lead to underground exchanges. But for the rest, I feel like there’s better drugs if you’re looking for a good time
School is more than just what you learn. It’s crucial for development to socialize with children your age, and close to your age. There’s a reason the stereotype that homeschoolers are socially awkward exists
There’s also nothing saying they are even in the US. Or at this point even human
Lmao, .world and reddit are still worlds apart
‘Interneting’ does not suggest using a search engine
Or maybe it’s the governments dislike of VPNs being used to bypass surveillance
Gotcha. I misunderstood. I didn’t think it would be just that, because of course if they have your phone they have the contents. Signal encrypts end to end, but if they have the end device of course it isn’t encrypted.
I know about the setting. Why are you saying that information is sent to Google’s servers? As far as I have found, that information is only stored locally on your phone
Edit: If this is just about the fact it’s on the phone locally, of course if they have your actual phone they can see it. Signal is end to end encrypted, but it isn’t go to be encrypted on each end, otherwise you couldn’t read messages. Them getting your actual phone is very different from them intercepting the communication without you knowing
Source? I am not seeing anything about that. The only problem I have seen on Android is when applications use firebase for notifications, which is most play store apps to be fair, just no FDroid apps or some privacy preserving apps
You also don’t need to do this on Android unless you are concerned about random people seeing the messages on your screen. Signal on Android does not use Google’s push notification service
As I already replied om one of your other comments:
It’s not because of push notifications. the message is not sent to firebase, just a signal that the app should do a refresh.
Is is 100% because of firebase. Here is an example payload from firebases official document:
{
"message":{
"token":"bk3RNwTe3H0:CI2k_HHwgIpoDKCIZvvDMExUdFQ3P1...",
"notification":{
"title":"Portugal vs. Denmark",
"body":"great match!"
}
}
}
https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/customize-messages/set-message-type
Notification history is purely local to the device. It is not sent to any servers.
It’s not because of push notifications. the message is not sent to firebase, just a signal that the app should do a refresh.
Is is 100% because of firebase. Here is an example payload from firebases official document:
{
"message":{
"token":"bk3RNwTe3H0:CI2k_HHwgIpoDKCIZvvDMExUdFQ3P1...",
"notification":{
"title":"Portugal vs. Denmark",
"body":"great match!"
}
}
}
https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/customize-messages/set-message-type
Notification history is purely local to the device. It is not sent to any servers.
And where do those data centers get their money? Without end customers to sell to, there is no markets. If all jobs are taken by robots, then people will not have work and will not get paychecks to buy stuff. Basically the only option is true socialism and everyone just gets their government checks. But I also don’t really see that happening
Anthropic is literally the one that refused to let them make autonomous weapons with their AI. There is a whole wikipedia page about it. They explicitly don’t want their AI used for weapons. Of course, that wouldn’t stop governments/militaries from doing so anyway. It would be different if Mozilla was working with OpenAI, but of the two Anthropic is currently the better one.
And yes, the AI is out of the box. Just like once nuclear warheads were created, there is no going back.