Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]

  • 319 Posts
  • 1.6K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: November 24th, 2022
  • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOPtochapotraphouse@hexbear.net•Ohio, Michigan Republicans In Released Audio: "Endgame" Is To Ban Trans Care "For Everyone" (cw transphobia, suic*de)English
    8·
    2 years ago

    Assemble the lawyers and sue. Keep brining awareness. Ohio might be a bit tougher, but Michigan included gender and identity in their protected class laws. Michigan currently has an open lesbian who was one of the lawyers to get gay marraige rights at the Supreme Court as AG. Dana Nessel is a Democrat LIB , but she is very good on LGBTQ rights.

    The chuds are abusing cherry picked psudoscience NIH articles and use phobes with degrees to publish junk the vast majority of scientists disagree with as a paper over. We need more people to come out and voice their experiences in these lawsuits and provide testimony in state houses.

    Unfortunately it has come down to an expensive law fight and Republicans have become extremely efficent at cookie cutter laws which they pass from state to state to state.

  • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.nettoaskchapo@hexbear.net•[drunk theory question] do you all think revolutionary masculinity is an oxymoron? if not, what would it consist ofEnglish
    4·
    2 years ago

    It’s a sort of belief of exclusively and upholding the partiarchy as if there is something inherently “special” or “unique” about their biological gender having do to with their talents. That being born with a penis grants a certain authority and natural skill that being born without a penis has. Like Marx wouldn’t have been Marx if he was born Female. Which we all know now simply isn’t true.

    There are plenty of strong women type, organizers, philosophers.

    One could argue that BECAUSE of the partiarchy and BECAUSE Marx was born with a penis, people raised in patriarchal doctrine saw Marx as more of a natural leader as their PREJUDICE told them a women could never lead.

    This is the stuff we need to root out and say it’s ok to put partiarchy down and not just because it’s hillgasm HER TURN, but because it is now recognized as an archaic discrimatory belief system that hurts both men and women alike railroading percieved or actual gender down a socially constructed path.

    If you want to reach “chuds” you can make an argument patriarchy negates meritocracy and they so deeply value meritocracy as it is a central lie anglo society is built on. It might short circuit their lobsters and rats brainworms.