

Progressive JPGs slowly blurring into focus


Progressive JPGs slowly blurring into focus


I’m the right age to be in that venn diagram of having had an ICQ account in 1996 and a Snapchat account in 2014.
Where one of my favorite things about the iPhone was that it finally put the nail in the coffin of Macromedia Adobe Flash.


This is actually a pretty common concern for businesses on dealing with whether and how to protect themselves when installing improvements, business-critical equipment, or other hard-to-move stuff on land or in a building without a long term lease in place.
The tenant deals with it by either building out a portable infrastructure to where they can move their business quickly if need be, or by protecting themselves legally to where the landlord can’t kick them out on a short notice, by negotiating a long term lease.


Yes, this has everything to do with AI, because this is an AI vendor locking out a customer from their ordinary workflow.
At the same time, this is a generalizable example not limited to AI, where any form of vendor lock-in on a critical business function becomes a potential point of failure when the vendor drops the customer or stops working. It’s true of a cloud provider, an email provider, an ISP, any software provider that can revoke access/authority, or even non-tech vendors like a landlord or a temp agency or an electric utility.


I think it’s worth being clear about the scope of the rating. iFixit has always been about repairability defined by parts availability, and its ratings consider software restrictions only to the point where it interferes with the user experience when replacing parts to restore things to the original performance.
Customizability (in software or otherwise) isn’t part of the score. Durability/longevity isn’t part of the score, either. Those are things that I want, too, but I can recognize those are outside the scope of what iFixit advocates for.
I do have some concerns about the partnerships creating a conflict of interest, but sometimes that feedback loop is helpful for improving the product, where the maintainer of a standard also has a consulting business in helping others meet that standard. Ideally there’s a wall between the two sides (advisors versus raters), but the mere fact that one company might do both things isn’t that big of a deal in itself.


The EFF reporting about Fog Data Science’s sources is unsure of the ultimate source of the data.
But if you’re concerned about the sources used by data brokers in general, collection and use of location data by corporations is pretty much unregulated, so it’s fair to assume that brokers use every trick they can, including buying from anyone who sells the information. Which the carriers are widely believed to do, but are kinda hush hush about it.


For your specific example, Dominos still does 100% of its own delivery, even when ordered through a third party app. When you order Dominos through Doordash, the person who shows up is a Dominos franchise employee wearing a Dominos uniform. Domino’s was exclusively first party delivery up until 2023, when they partnered with Uber Eats under this framework (we’ll let your app access our stores if we still handle the delivery itself), and they added Doordash this month and are currently rolling it out to all locations.


Using a simple flip phone with no app ecosystem would fix this, right?
Probably not.
The cell phone network will need to know where every subscribed phone is, in order to be able to route simple phone calls and text messages. In the old days, that might have meant very broad ideas of which areas were covered by which towers (often divided into 3 slices of 120° each from a single physical tower), and maybe some timing data to understand how much to offset the signal timing to make up for the speed of light.
But each generation of cell phone technology has been about adding more capacity into each wireless frequency, and the towers have specialized tricks for transmitting and receiving on the same channel at the same time with different devices, by getting more precise about transmitting or listening in very specific directions and distances, with spatial signatures that distinguish between devices. It’s all very cool and mathematically beyond my understanding, but the result is that the towers have much more precise location data about the actual handsets.
So the cell phone companies have your location data. The question becomes whether they sell them to location aggregators who resell the data on the open market, and whether some of the buyers of that data are law enforcement agencies without a warrant.


At the time, Google posted that it was the first video whose view count exceeded the limits of a 32-bit signed int (about 2.1 billion), so they had to refactor some code to make sure the counter would continue to work correctly once the video exceeded that many views.


Maybe like 10 years ago, someone did a regression analysis to see which stations were most expensive to advertise in, when corrected for actual ridership starting or ending their train rides swiping in and out at those stations. For the most part, most stations’ advertising prices pretty closely matched the number of riders, with the clear outlier of the Pentagon station.
I can’t find that article anymore because Google search turned into dog shit, but this more recent article basically covers the contours.


It’s not. It’s a parody account that took advantage of Twitter’s unbelievably stupid decision to hand out checkmarks to anyone who paid for an account.


Yeah. AI is really good at generating footage and stills for these infrared night vision types of surveillance cameras, in large part because they don’t need to be high resolution and are in black and white.
Because of the way they’re trained on cats and deer have eyes that reflect light back at the camera, these generated images also tend to give that effect even to animals (like humans) that wouldn’t have as pronounced of that effect.
Unintuitive locked down garbage that can’t do anything a PC can’t do for half the price.
From the user perspective, enterprise managed Windows is locked down, too, and somehow less reliable.
Most of the software engineers I know in FAANG and similar tier companies use Macbooks to program. Poke around a coffee shop in the bay area during a weekday and look around.
And personally, I switched to Mac about 15 years ago mainly because dependency management and the shell made more sense to me coming from Linux. Windows has always been trash, and most other non-Apple OEMs make the actual physical laptop experience worse (hinges, behavior on closing the lid, trackpad behavior and size, power management, display quality in both brightness and pixel density, webcam/audio behavior).


They tightened up the rules on IPOs after so many companies with no futures basically pumped and dumped their stock on the public. Now the way to dump on public bagholders is through SPAC mergers.
Ever since Lion King came out the “wildebeest” name has been much more common.
But the most commonly used logo for the GNU software is an anthropomorphized gnu.
In the software, the official position is that the G in GNU is pronounced. But for the animal known as a gnu, the g isn’t pronounced.


Yes. There were plenty of people saying “but this business doesn’t have a path to making more money than it spends.” There was, at the time, serious doubt about internet advertising as a viable business.
And the companies building out the telecommunications infrastructure. Between the 1996 reforms creating a lot of redundant competition for competing telecommunications networks, mania about the information superhighway, there was basically never going to be a way for these companies that spent billions deploying real resources in creating telecommunications lines to make enough money to even make their interest payments. So they mostly went bankrupt and their assets got sold to others at a fraction that it cost to build them.
Warren Buffett sat the whole thing out and his portfolio significantly underperformed the market as a whole. His philosophy of only wanting to invest in companies that he saw as undervalued, with a low price for their earnings or dividends or general enterprise value, didn’t work really well for the prevailing investor sentiment at the time.


briefly released millions of tracks that were scraped from Spotify via BitTorrent.
That’s just an awkward sentence construction but it makes sense: they released track via Bittorrent. The tracks were scraped from Spotify.
I sold my car that was purchased from a dealership via private party sale.
I charged my laptop that normally accepts 100W via a 20W phone charger.
I would’ve used a “which” phrase with commas to avoid the confusion, but the sentence as written is valid and makes sense.
Desktop Linux is seeing higher and higher market share, not just because Linux is growing but also because the desktop mode of computing is shrinking, especially for personal use. There are lots of people who used to own laptops/desktops but don’t anymore.