If you’re in your late 70s. You have an excuse. But are not likely to think as you do. But if so. Sorry you were fooled by such arsehole Corporations lieing about their own research for decades.

If younger. Then you grew up knowing how dangerous smoking was. Even if you failed to believe the government telling you so. You have no excuse for makeing the choices you did.

And most of us who made those dumb choices do not expect others to take responsibility for them. Even if we find/found stopping hard. In nearly 60 years. Absolutely every government in my lifetime. Has reduced the excuses of the generations forward to fall for the stupidity. Including my father who gave up in his late 60s after cancer. But knew full well how dumb his smoking was when I was a toddler.

You are entitled to your opinion. But everyone else is also entitled to consider you pathetic. For thinking the government is responsible for fixing your own stupidity.

The idea is to prevent addiction forming in newer generation. Rather then banning those they have already developed addiction.

The minimum age has been rising for a couple of years.

This is actually a manifesto promises so has fairly high support. (Unlike almost everything else the gov has done).

Going bankrupt is a great way to avoid such questions.

And conveniently happens when you refuse to show customers. How you plan to ensure abuse stops.

You realise a no confidence vote. Only means an election when the party in power has a narrow or no majority.

In most cases it would mean remapping the leadership of the existing party. Definitely here. It would mean a new PM. But with Labour not only having a majority. But also having removed left of centre MPs. Actual changes would be minimal.

More concerning. Either the FO made a political decision without PM authority. Indicating the PM dose not have control or confidence of the government.

Or the PM ordered the FO not to inform him. Meaning he had suspicions. Indicating his claim of not knowing. Is a lie to parliament.

Both of these events should very much mean a call for a vote of no confidence. And am explanation to the constituency of Amy MP not calling for a vote. Or voting confidence in the PM.

The vote was very clearly for duel membership only with CEC approved parties .

While other options were prevented from being available. So questioning it acceptable,

The statement that this move is against the vote. Is openly false.

Also as far as I know the majority of the parties listed. Also ban duel membership. Feel free to list any that do not.

Agreed. We will go. But the effort in building a colony on another planet. When that planet is not habitable. Is equal to that of building habits in centrifugal space stations. Using astroidbelt resources. Minus 1/2 the planatry landing and lift of costs.

It gives us all the plan b advantages of civilizations outside of one planet. At much lower costs.

Being part of parliament. Is not the same as having MPs vote. Parliament has the right to override the actions of any government. As parliament is sovereign not the government.

Many daft ideas existed in the 14 century.

Humanity grew out of most of their shit.

If we have done it for 100s of years before the discovery of reasoned science is your best argument. Give up.

Yes gender is a made up concept.

But sex is also not binary.

So ideas like biologically mailed are just that. Ideas with no real merit.

Biologically XY could be used. But without clear medical evidence. The BBC has zero idea if that applies. And people are known to be born female. To the po8nt of getting pregnant with xy chromosomes.

And while documented cases are rare. They are rare because it is rare that anyone is actually tested,. So how common is not really known.

Yep. A desperate attempts to not take sides while ignoring actual science.

And with everything BBC not taking sides translates to supporting the arseholes.

No just an exaggerated tittle.

The article makes it clear. The experiment just suggest free will is more mentally taxing and calculated then random will.

What a crap title.

Never seen a folk living near to any fossil fuel power plants who are unemployed.

Yeah sounds just as fucking ridiculous as a statement doesn’t it.

Likely thought it was the best option for gaining his seat. Now he thinks otherwise.

Honestly when labour turned right wing. As a way to win elections. They opened them selves to members choosing them to win elections and nothing more.

Turn out is so lo for these local elections. Real idiots never get excluded.

If folks actually turned up to vote and paid attention to who was running. Things may improve.

But when high turnout locals still tend to be in the 10% or less of voters. Way lower for most.

Most councilors only have to rely on a few hundred loyal supporters at most to turn an election.

LOL yep pretty sure anyone with brains called that.

Now let’s see what happens when NATO members try to go through. I expect him to make aoint of nations that refused to follow his offers.

And he will Def pick on all smaller non NATO members ships.

Given he has threatened to attack any ship paying to pass. And China is the nation that was first invited to do that.

Trump starting an open war with China is well and truly a possibility ATM.

Yep and not it looks like the Tories will no longer be in the big 2.

Suddenly their members give a shit.

Honestly though as bad as that looks.

Those of us who have been calling for this for decades. Need to really amp up the push.

For the first time ever. Every party may be able to see the negatives. Or more accurately care about them.

Or greens have the spine nessesery to refuse to support non evidenced claims.

Israel has done plenty of prove able shit. Spreading non evidenced conspiracy theories is just as dangerous as ignoring their evidenced actions.

Remember just because criticism of Israel is not antisemitism. Dose not mean anti-Semitic arseholes never criticise Israel.

Jumping on every negative attack on Israel supports the true antisemitics as much as blaming them for every negative comment on Israel supports the Zionists.

Unlikely. The difference is every retail employee in the nation. Is clearly told not to try and stop theft etc. Just report it.

And while the companies claim it’s to prevent harm to employees. It is very much to prevent employees or thieves from suing them.

ASDA and any other retail company. Would be held responsible for any harm done. By both failing to warn staff not to get involved. And failing to adaquotely disapline staff that do.

If ASDA was to hire this person. Knowing this happened. And then some event caused anyone to get injured. ASDA would go bankrupt.