LaggyKar

  • 0 Posts
  • 264 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle

  • The problem is, YouTube has no real competition. No one has the same thing they do. And the same applies to a lot of things today.

    Another issue is, subscription services can just raise the price and then start charging people more without those people doing anything, or possibly even noticing, which differs from individual purchases where you had to make a judgement about the price each time. Now, people have to make an actively cancel in order to not agree to new prices (or EULA changes for that matter). It should really be the other way around, so that if a service raises their price, people have to actively agree to the new price in order for the service to keep charging them.

    Can’t speak for Uber Eats or Starbucks though.









  • LaggyKartoProgrammingAI Coding
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    but it is a task of a programmer to review it before publishing it.

    By contrast however, the programmer does not generally need to review the machine code produced by their compiler when coding in C.


  • LaggyKartoProgrammingAI Coding
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s not though. Programming languages, like assembly before them, are deterministic. If you run the same C code again the same environment, it will do the same thing, and altering the code will alter the behaviour correspondingly. It’s possible to reason about it. The same does not apply to LLMs. You can’t reason about their behavior, when means you can’t build anything non-trivial with them. All that is mentioned in the article.







  • LaggyKartoProgrammer HumorCGNAT version 2
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 months ago

    I know this is humor, but for the record this wouldn’t work. Each simultaneous TCP connection needs a unique four-tuple (source address, source port, destination address, destination port). If a lot the people behind the NAT try to connect to the same place (destination address and port) at the same time (something popular like Google, YouTube or Netflix), and their source address is the same, the source port needs to be different for each connection. So after at most 65535 connections within a short time the NAT would run out of ports and no one behind the same NAT would be able to open new connections to the same place until the NAT mapping expiries.

    So you could have at most tens of thousands of people behind the same NAT, maybe even fewer to make it reliable.


  • LaggyKartoProgrammingPNG is back!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lossless WebP is still gets way better compression than PNG though, this doesn’t change that. Although they mention they’re looking to improve it in the next version, so we’ll see then.