Having frequent or traumatic experiences with members of a group is not a good reason to hate that group at all unless it’s actually the group’s defining feature directly causing it, and it’s their own choice.
That’s different to suffering from trauma as a result, which obviously you can’t control, and might result in some behaviour that looks similar on the surface.
I mean the relation between those isn’t wrong but like… we can’t simulate complicated physics. At least not at any reasonable speed.
The wealth of industrialized nations is only possible through exploitation of developing countries. When conditions there become literally unlivable, everything collapses and everyone loses. maybe russia could slightly benefit since they aren’t doing super well as is and have a lot of land that will become pretty good. Even then, they can kiss goodbye to seafood forever, and it certainly won’t be easy.
Cleaning sewers? Generally anything waste related?
There are some people that actually kinda love those jobs, but idk if there are enough of them. And a game of chicken where the first person to become too annoyed at the smell in the streets fixes the issue would be… not great.
But anyway that’d only ever be an issue if there’s no market at all but that’s not a necessity to not have capitalism
The eye brows visible under the hair and the eye style feel pretty anime coded to me tbh
We aren’t the data hoarder type either and doing this would break half the functionality. It’s old systems not built with data deletion in mind that rely on there for example always being a customer associated with a transaction. That customer might not have anything other than an ID anymore, but it needs the ID. And you’re usually not legally allowed to just delete financial transactions.
It’s a reference implementation, this stuff is intentional for debug purposes.
Not that I have much faith that final implementations will be secure lol
Just in case you don’t know since it seems like it might interest you, there is a game called powerwash simulator where you just pressure wash various things.
Just “some kind” won’t necessarily help. A gun has a good chance of just pissing it off more, and any melee weapon you better be a martial arts master.
Bear spray. You want bear spray.
Especially at the start of words, see also e.g. pterodactyl, which from what I’ve gathered native english speakers just pronounce without the p.
Yeah, it’s more about that. The fastest acting, lowest overhead form of government is a dictatorship. The slowest would probably be trying to reach a consensus from discussion with the whole populace. You’ll always need delegates for decision making if you want to make any society wide decisions, but it has proven very hard to make elected officials actually act in the people’s best interest.
…why is it this meme making me realize that the name is a pun on warui, meaning bad
Yeah, lots of correct observations, but also lots of wrong conclusions. I’d even argue the very first point about culture is very relevant, because japanese culture inherently puts a small bit of breaks on the aspects of capitalism that spiral out of control (they have tons of hypercapitalist issues too, though).
I think it’s correct that having private companies compete has certain advantages in railway infrastructure, if the right framework is given. Imagine someone from here was to start a railway company - they would know about induced demand, about the importance of having frequent service even at times of lower demand to enable rail as primary transport. They wouldn’t have to convince rightoids that spending public money on that is worth it, they could just do it and see the results. In general the good thing about markets is that they enable less planning overhead as everyone focuses on their own thing. Loosely some sort of swarm intelligence.
But none of that will ever work when cars are effectively subsidized and even private rail companies would still be beholden to massive political hurdles for building new lines. Though especially the latter is a real question about tradeoffs of benefit for society vs. individual preference with no single correct answer.
2km in 20 minuten ist definitiv sehr schnell für die meisten. Das sind immerhin 6km/h. Das werden meistens doch eher 30-40. Aber dafür gibts im Zweifelsfall dann Fahrräder…
Wenn die da von “wir machen quasi einen shuttleservice” reden, frag ich mich auch, ob da die entsprechende Nahverkehrsanbindung auch existiert. Glaub zwar fast, dass die sich dafür einfach zu gut finden, aber würd mich auch nich wundern, wenn sich da dann doch mal verplant wurde.
Aber wenn die Leute dann über Parkplatzmangel meckern, wenn es trotzdem noch imo ziemlich viele 0.75 Parkplätze pro Person gibt, statt über mangelnden Nahverkehr, scheint das Problem dann doch eher bei den Anwohnern zu sein.
You can even have a child be the abuser. One community I’m in had a case of a 13 year old lying about their age and manipulating MULTIPLE older teenagers. People are just complex.
It can be rather helpful for some things but I’ve yet to see any actual data supporting it being “substantially faster”. To make something that works and is of equal quality, that is.
I mean if you’re just making the same slightly different website for different customers or similarly boilerplate stuff, I’m sure it’s substantial. But that’s not really most of dev.
Tbh I would guess that the average cis person cares less about their gender than the average trans person. Not that plenty wouldn’t in fact feel quite tortured by a forced gender change, but strength of gender identity is a spectrum in itself, and to actively decide that you want to transition - whether or not you actually do it - already requires you to be somewhere on the stronger feeling side, so there’s some selection bias.
Removed by mod
Overall, I just try to be better than average for people in my area. If everyone did that, we’d keep moving the average to a better point. I don’t need to completely upend my life for ultimately negligible impact, but I refuse to be the problem.