• 3 Posts
  • 352 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle



  • Ok, what I just read send to be a modest attempt to create understanding by somebody who doesn’t understand. And honestly, that’s… Well, not ideal, but understandable. Everyone wants to understand things, and it’s normal to come to with explanations that make sense.

    Certainly our society does an absolute shit job of teaching these concepts, and arguably they don’t teach them at all.

    Personally, I’ve done a lot of reading to better understand the question “what do left and right mean in context of political orientation” and I’m going to share what I put together. It’s possible somebody will come along and correct me.

    The Left/Right difference is regarding whether there’s a belief that society has a natural order it adheres to (Right), or if society can choose how it organizes itself (Left).

    On the Right you get disagreements about what the natural order is, but they all agree that there is a natural order and generally that if you try to go against the natural order then society wide disaster will result.

    On the Left you get disagreements about what order society should choose to organize itself into, but they all agree that there’s a choice to be made and generally that if you’re not careful there are people who will exploit society to the detriment of everyone.

    This distinction traces its origins to the French revolution when royalists (Right, believe the natural order includes God putting the king in charge) were confronted by the revolutionaries (Left, believe that society can choose a different way to order itself than letting God put somebody in charge).

    It has nothing to do with work, at least not directly. Coincidentally, most Rightists believe that the natural order includes needing to work, and Leftists coincidentally believe that letting a person die due to not working is bad. But that’s more to do with personal morals than Left/Right. It’s totally possible to have a leftist say that a person who doesn’t work deserves to die, because that’s not what defines the person as a leftist; their believe about whether society can choose how it orders itself is what makes them a leftist.


  • It’s worse than that. Any historian will tell you that the work of historians is basically gathering clues and hints to piece together a coherent story that fits all the data. Which is fine, except when you’re using that story to interpret legal doctrine. The very foundation of originalist philosophy, that we should interpret law according to history, is flawed because history can never be perfectly known or understood. We might have extremely good data and knowledge, we might have a NEARLY perfectly accurate story of what happened. But “nearly” isn’t enough, and it’s that very flaw that fascists use to exploit originalist philosophy to push their own agenda.



  • Yeah well, it’s not their job to keep fascists out if power. It’s OUR job. Us, the voters.

    Voting works. If it didn’t, they wouldn’t be trying so hard to stop us from doing it. And once we have Rank Choice we’ll be able to move beyond the “an actual fascist/not an actual fascist” dichotomy. But until then, for fucks sake, vote “not an actual fascist” even if you don’t like the person you’re voting for. I don’t care how terrible they are, if they’re not an actual fascist then you vote for them. THAT’S how you keep fascists out of power.


  • This is why I’m giving up on changing the DNC and refocusing my efforts on changing the voting system from First Past The Post to Rank Choice.

    But we also need the fascists out of power, and kept out of power.

    These two things have to be achieved in parallel. That’s why I vote Democrat, but only until I have Rank Choice at which point the Democrats will become my second pick (and then eventually third pick, and hopefully someday not one of my picks at all)