I worked in telecom for a couple of years up until recently. There’s actually a growing body of self-regulation going on within the SMS industry. Most notably, any business sending text messages has to apply for a “license” to do so, with some pretty strict consent requirements. Violating those requirements comes with heavy penalties, mostly enforced by downstream carriers. If you’re curious, 10DLC/A2P are the terms to Google for.

If you ask the FSF, open source is a bigger set than free software, mostly to do with restrictions on the uses of the code

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html.en

That’s unfortunate. Devices like that are basically impossible to use on certain enterprise networks (e.g. college campuses). There really needs to be an override

I’m no expert, so take what I’m about to say with a grain of salt.

Fundamentally, a LLM is just a fancy autocomplete; there’s no source of knowledge it’s tapping into, it’s just guessing words (though it is quite good at it). Correspondingly, even if it did have a pool of knowledge, even that can’t be perfect, because the truth is never quite so black and white in many areas.

In other words, hard.

Does anyone have the recipe on hand? I’m curious what it actually recommended but I couldn’t find it with a cursory Google search

Me personally? Not really. But it’s definitely a feature I’ve heard folks wanting.

Tangential, but my last employer (US based) outsourced L1 IT to a call center in India, and it was maddening. They didn’t know very much beyond the script, and often you just had to say the right words to get your issue escalated, but it would always take a day or so to get called back. It drove me nuts as an engineer, but I’m sure it works fine for people who are less familiar with computers.

I’ve found that the chat agents are much less able to “be a human” and help you out, it feels like talking to a chatbot sometimes. It’s a lot easier to get someone to empathize with your problem over the phone, IME

Someone on Mastodon raised a good point that the idea of “changing handles” is incompatible with a lot of fedi, too. I’m curious how they will tackle that problem when they eventually federate

And then painfully learn which subset of the bindings each editor supports :(

FWIW, /etc/passwd itself contains no passwords (the name exists for historical reasons) but it definitely is a globally accessible file that can give you clues about the target system. Given this, it’s more likely the user is attempting to find out if arbitrary disk reads are possible by using a well known path on many servers.

Mastodon actually lets you follow hashtags, which is a nice compromise, but it definitely isn’t curated so you gotta pick which hashtags you follow kinda carefully.

The UI is a bit confusing here. This is a link post with a body. Click the title of the post to go to the linked blogpost

I think it scratches a similar itch as most techbros: “if I can solve this hard problem, all problems are easy!” It’s a mentality I see constantly, especially on the orange site.

Doesn’t really answer your question, but I’ve been really happy making "faux latte"s and such with my Moka pot. A little inconvenient to clean, but definitely takes up less space than a mini espresso machine.

I’d be careful doing this, as the sensor could pivot. I had a mount that did this and I felt like I was constantly having to mess with my Z offset

Yeah, just discovered that, woof.

Solargraph is the better one I’ve tried. I tried the Shopify LSP, but had trouble getting it to give me any suggestions, and I’m not well-versed enough in Ruby’s tooling yet to troubleshoot. Thanks!

Thanks for the recommendation of Liftoff! I really didn’t like Jerboa but liftoff seems like a nice app.

What about taping a piece of cardboard between frame and the door jam? This would prevent the door from fully “closing”. Of course, this does mean that leaving the screen door closed with the glass door open will have a notably “unscreened” portion.