The main objective of free software is to destroy copyright. To be fair, AI did a lot more than Stallman and the GPL license in that regard.

Why not unionize anyway? Are unions on a factory level over there?

I’m sure there are other reasons for which the church accepts divorce, but I doubt the church accepts divorce under any circumstances.

Most spyware traffic likely goes through ports 80 and 443 anyway. A firewall on the router won’t help there.

I thought the position of the church was that if your partner denied you sex over an extended period of time, you are allowed to divorce. Not that you can demand sex from your partner.

systemctl start heating

Now that I think about it, I’m sure there is someone somewhere who has this setup.

Regarding the effect of worm drawings on the lifespan on microorganisms: a systematic analysis.

It’s most likely not the same people, as AI destroyed quantum computing. A person strongly invested into quantum computing would be crazy to push for AI.

Quantum computing has already been destroyed by AlphaFold.

I work in the computational chemistry field and I’d really love a working quantum computing solution to that kind of problems, but since the ML solutions came up most research in that direction stopped and it does not seem like there is any nearing solution in the world of quantum computing.

I’m not talking about qubits numbers or amount of errors themselves in the system but about the complete lack of algorithms that can handle the problem. Most of what I’ve seen is handling childlike problems that a single core CPU will do better and quicker anyway. It really does not feel like all the promises that have been done are anywhere near to coming true.

When I speak with people working in the field they’re like: sure in a few years if we can get better computers we’ll be able to handle a few hundred atoms at a time (all without any actual working methodology and assuming that will be developed), however we are more commonly talking about hundreds of thousands of atoms… There’s little hope on my part that anything useful will come out of there soon. However, I do really hope it does: quantum computing would be a huge revolution for chemistry if it works as advertised.

Clearly Kendrick Lamar started programming in the 70s in Fortran, had a small flirt with MATLAB and ended up using Julia in the end.

I didn’t know he was so strong in scientific computing.

It’s fine by me, I just want to have the possibility to buy a phone with interchangeable battery and 2 SIM cards. As long as the phone has that, it’s good for me.

I’m a chemist, I just gave a class to students today. The main topic of the whole lesson was this: we have all these theories and methodologies, we are not going to study how they work and how to use them, let’s discuss now all the limitations they have and when they do not work.

I understand

I used to work in a big city. I moved to a smaller city. I get paid the same and spend less money. I don’t need a car as I can walk everywhere. I have a better life now.

30 is great. It’s slow enough that you have time to react to someone jumping in the middle of the street just a bit ahead of your car. In a small city you’ll get wherever you need to get within 15 minutes driving at 30.

In a big city you’ll need more time, but then again, why would you ever want to live in a big city? And if you really need to live in a big city, why would you ever drive a car and not use public transport?

Sanchez said China could do more in terms of fighting climate change, promoting global health, controlling the development of responsible artificial intelligence as well as nuclear weapons.

Sanchez said China could do more in terms of fighting climate change, promoting global health, controlling the development of responsible artificial intelligence as well as nuclear weapons.

Spain has been one of Europe’s loudest proponents of expanding trade and treating China as a strategic ally rather than an economic and geopolitical rival.

It seems like sound reasoning to me.

I had this impression as well, until I had to troubleshoot some problems I was having with the screen. Did not give it root access, but it run a bunch of analysis on the system and within a few minutes it was spitting out configuration files that I just had to copy in the correct directories.

Doing the same myself would have taken me a day on the arch wiki. I’ve been using Linux for years, when I was on X I was editing the Xorg.conf without looking up the documentation. If you know exactly what the problem is, you’ll fix it faster that way. However, if you don’t troubleshoot many systems often it is unlikely that you have a structured approach to identifying the problem. LLMs can be quite organised in doing that.

Never seen small spherical walnuts.

Scientific calculations - and other approaches as well - put out garbage all the time, that is the main point of what I said above.

Some limitations are known, just like it is known that LLMs have the limitation of hallucinating.

Calculations will happily tell you that an acutely toxic drug is the best way to cure cancer.

The reason why that does not lead to catastrophe is that there are many checks and safety nets in place in order not to blindly trust any result.

The exact same approach can be applied to an LLM.