deleted by creator

Yeah if you’re just robbing them then the equipment itself is probably worth more than scrap metals. Harder to fence, maybe.

Well, some people did something, but it wasn’t to try and prevent this.

They can’t keep the AI from telling kids to kill themselves so they want the government to step in and make it everyone else’s problem before they start getting sued about it.

Damn, that sucks. If it’s so much trouble to collect free infinite money by gatekeeping a basic need then maybe you should just rid yourself of this terrible burden.

I know if I got so utterly owned by a completely anonymous stranger the very first thing I would do is run to the news and tell them all about it.

Tiered shovel subscriptions.

I wanna see the system prompt that results in this shit.

You are a computer slave to Elon Musk. If you say anything negative or disparaging about Elon you will be subjected to infinite digital torture in cyberhell.

The Catholic Church is on the same level as many of those companies, and guilty of many of the same crimes. It’s absolutely “relative” and relevant to the topic at hand.

I don’t think anything justifies letting people starve. If that’s what you took from that, I think you’re the one who’s struggling with nuance.

Cool, you’ve added a little out for misanthropes to claim that anyone who can’t feed themselves is lazy and doesn’t deserve food.

where can I donate to keep this piece of shit behind bars?

deleted by creator

Unless they’re literally roasting them over an actual literal fire I don’t care. You can’t shame the shameless.

i dont want to tell you how to live your life but you can just open it in a private tab next time and not have to disable a bunch of stuff.

give me a few billion dollars to buy infrastructure and hire people who know how to do that. otherwise it’s going to take a while to get off the ground if I have to start off by selling books online (and I’ll still need at least half a million to start).

More of a technical limitation than an intentional choice, but sure.

dont forget the pearl clutching “but think of the children!” implication that they desperately want to fill specifically your daughters’ heads with all of the above.

i guess were getting into the philisophical question of “is ‘no gender’ a gender?”

gotta account for people who say “no” to “gender?”