Open
Conversation
See issue #25 The first numbering jump was due to a code snippet that was not indented as expected. The second jump was due to a paragraph breaking the numbering. I had to hard-code the first number of the new series (23), this is not ideal.
Collaborator
|
Can we come up with a better solution? |
Collaborator
Author
|
On 06/19/2017 10:58 AM, Peter Kroon wrote:
Can we come up with a better solution?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#27 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABUWuulRCZIOcCM4toa5bYzfvRMi1za1ks5sFjgYgaJpZM4N9dnp>.
Maybe, but I did not find any. Feel free to have a look.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See issue #25
The first numbering jump was due to a code snippet that was not indented
as expected. The second jump was due to a paragraph breaking the
numbering. I had to hard-code the first number of the new series (23),
this is not ideal.