Skip to content

Pioneerbuilder/reflect

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

3 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Reflect

Performance comparation between treeMap-field-reflection and cached-method-invoking

Requirements

Given a java bean, and return the asc sorted string with key and value

Hardware

Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7300HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz @ 2.50GHz

RAM 8G

OS Win10 64bits

#JVM Configuration

-Xms128m

-Xmx750m

-XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=240m

-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

-XX:SoftRefLRUPolicyMSPerMB=50

-ea

-Dsun.io.useCanonCaches=false

-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true

-XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError

-XX:-OmitStackTraceInFastThrow

Racers

java bean has 3 fields

1.OriginalReflect (someone's coding)

2.TreeMapFieldReflect

3.CachedMethodReflect

Result

Cycle for 1 million times as follow:

1.OriginalReflect 3.132 seconds

2.TreeMapFieldReflect 2.480 seconds

3.CachedMethodReflect 2.011 seconds

Cycle for 2 million times as follow:

1.OriginalReflect 3.621 seconds

2.TreeMapFieldReflect 3.391 seconds

3.CachedMethodReflect 2.260 seconds

Cycle for 5 million times as follow:

1.OriginalReflect 14.247~15.869 seconds

2.TreeMapFieldReflect 12.638~14.097 seconds

3.CachedMethodReflect 8.755~12.286 seconds

Cycle for 10 million times as follow:

1.OriginalReflect 21.021~22.762 seconds

2.TreeMapFieldReflect 16.779~17.179 seconds

3.CachedMethodReflect 12.336~12.916 seconds

Cycle for 20 million times as follow:

CachedMethodReflect 401.049 seconds

we cannot put so many data in a JVM, the performance is unacceptable

About

reflect demo or performance compare

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors

Languages