{compiler}[GCCcore/10.2.0,gcccuda/2020b] AOMP v13.0.2 by nordmoen · Pull Request #12909 · easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs

nordmoen · 2021-05-20T13:03:41Z

This is an updated version of the PR #12018. This PR updates the version
to 13.0-2. In addition this PR adds an improved patch which should
force the built modules to pick up the EasyBuild installed version of
gcc.

This module requires the aomp.py EasyBlock to build.

This is an updated version of the PR easybuilders#12018. This PR updates the version to `13.0-2`. In addition this PR adds an improved patch which should force the built modules to pick up the EasyBuild installed version of `gcc`. This module requires the `aomp.py` EasyBlock to build.

nordmoen · 2021-05-20T13:22:15Z

@migueldiascosta Could you test if the patch included here is enough to avoid the problems of #12018 and confusion between which gcc is picked up with LLVM?

migueldiascosta · 2021-05-21T00:57:18Z

Test report by @migueldiascosta
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2435
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
sms - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor (zen), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/399377ad4ec4ba947777c035a8b71d3f for a full test report.

migueldiascosta · 2021-05-21T00:59:49Z

Test report by @migueldiascosta
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2435
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
sms - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor (zen), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/2f15bdfaf84f4b90388ab093122777d9 for a full test report.

migueldiascosta · 2021-05-21T01:03:01Z

@nordmoen the earlier problems are solved, but the symbolic link creates problems when reinstalling ( OSError('Cannot call rmtree on a symbolic link',))

(note: the tests above don't include the cuda variant)

nordmoen · 2021-05-21T05:44:31Z

@nordmoen the earlier problems are solved, but the symbolic link creates problems when reinstalling ( OSError('Cannot call rmtree on a symbolic link',))

(note: the tests above don't include the cuda variant)

I tried to patch this out, but it immediately fails in other parts of the build. Any tips on workarounds?

migueldiascosta · 2021-05-21T06:23:29Z

@nordmoen so, is it the build_aomp.sh script that creates the link? maybe the easyblock can then cleanup by removing the link and renaming the directory?

nordmoen · 2021-05-21T06:25:31Z

@nordmoen so, is it the build_aomp.sh script that creates the link? maybe the easyblock can then cleanup by removing the link and renaming the directory?

It seems to be the build_project.sh script which is called from build_aomp.sh (and is required). I will look into removing it in the EasyBlock.

nordmoen · 2021-05-21T09:38:09Z

@migueldiascosta I updated the EasyBlock which seems to work locally. Could you test again when you have the time?

migueldiascosta · 2021-05-21T10:25:58Z

Test report by @migueldiascosta
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2435
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
sms - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor (zen), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/51c93914c3f152bc00fe8364ca2a0611 for a full test report.

nordmoen · 2021-06-08T06:31:35Z

Now that the aomp.py easyblock has been merged, could someone re-run these checks?

akesandgren · 2021-06-08T06:52:05Z

You can do that by doing, "eb --sync-pr-with-develop 12909"

nordmoen · 2021-06-08T07:21:42Z

You can do that by doing, "eb --sync-pr-with-develop 12909"

Thanks @akesandgren !

…nto aomp_v2

smoors · 2021-06-11T07:18:04Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2464"

smoors · 2021-06-11T09:14:25Z

Test report by @smoors
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2464
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node153.hydra.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz (ivybridge), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/f278102f87f3c6c272fca19f476c1634 for a full test report.

nordmoen · 2021-06-11T09:25:32Z

Test report by @smoors
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2464
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node153.hydra.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz (ivybridge), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/f278102f87f3c6c272fca19f476c1634 for a full test report.

@smoors To build the AOMP module with CUDA support you have to supply --cuda-compute-capabilities

smoors · 2021-06-11T13:22:18Z

Test report by @smoors
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2464
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node153.hydra.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz (ivybridge), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/f30ba6582420c1a43b4120611657b118 for a full test report.

boegel · 2021-06-11T17:33:57Z

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--cuda-compute-capabilities 7.0"
CORE_CNT=16

boegelbot · 2021-06-11T17:35:06Z

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12909 EB_ARGS="--cuda-compute-capabilities 7.0" /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12909 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 17432

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 859735482 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2021-06-11T18:37:29Z

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/f53aa7b664f83907e22675af0adfbb13 for a full test report.

boegel · 2021-06-11T18:41:57Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node3301.joltik.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6242 CPU @ 2.80GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/9280af96a8f88c7f5c1719c2bb0d7ef3 for a full test report.

boegel

lgtm

boegel · 2021-06-11T19:09:38Z

Going in, thanks @nordmoen!

Jørgen Nordmoen added 2 commits May 20, 2021 14:49

Removed non ASCII character from name

21de73b

branfosj added the new label May 20, 2021

branfosj added this to the 4.x milestone May 20, 2021

Jørgen Nordmoen added 2 commits May 25, 2021 11:44

Added necessary runtime dependency on 'ncurses'

6411b3b

Added build dependency on 'elfutils'

9283e12

nordmoen mentioned this pull request May 26, 2021

{compiler}[AOMP/11.12-0] Add AOMP compiler module #12018

Closed

Merge branch 'develop' into aomp_v2

35c6f55

easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Jun 8, 2021

boegel changed the title ~~{compiler}[AOMP/13.0-2] Add updated AOMP compiler module~~ {compiler}[GCCcore/10.2.0,gcccuda/2020b] AOMP v13.0.2 Jun 8, 2021

boegel requested changes Jun 8, 2021

View reviewed changes

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/a/AOMP/AOMP-13.0-2-GCCcore-10.2.0.eb Outdated

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/a/AOMP/AOMP-13.0-2-GCCcore-10.2.0.eb Outdated

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/a/AOMP/build_aomp-13.0-2.patch

Jørgen Nordmoen added 3 commits June 9, 2021 10:58

Added comments to patch file and renamed

ff2ff07

Merge branch 'aomp_v2' of github.com:nordmoen/easybuild-easyconfigs i…

ec70f5c

…nto aomp_v2

Remove sanity check from easyconfig

9ef4962

easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Jun 11, 2021

boegel approved these changes Jun 11, 2021

View reviewed changes

boegel merged commit 8d9105e into easybuilders:develop Jun 11, 2021

boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.4.1) Jun 11, 2021

Conversation

nordmoen commented May 20, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

nordmoen commented May 20, 2021

Uh oh!

migueldiascosta commented May 21, 2021

Uh oh!

migueldiascosta commented May 21, 2021

Uh oh!

migueldiascosta commented May 21, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

nordmoen commented May 21, 2021

Uh oh!

migueldiascosta commented May 21, 2021

Uh oh!

nordmoen commented May 21, 2021

Uh oh!

nordmoen commented May 21, 2021

Uh oh!

migueldiascosta commented May 21, 2021

Uh oh!

nordmoen commented Jun 8, 2021

Uh oh!

akesandgren commented Jun 8, 2021

Uh oh!

nordmoen commented Jun 8, 2021

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

smoors commented Jun 11, 2021

Uh oh!

smoors commented Jun 11, 2021

Uh oh!

nordmoen commented Jun 11, 2021

Uh oh!

smoors commented Jun 11, 2021

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 11, 2021

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Jun 11, 2021

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Jun 11, 2021

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 11, 2021

Uh oh!

boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 11, 2021

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

7 participants

nordmoen commented May 20, 2021 •

edited

Loading

migueldiascosta commented May 21, 2021 •

edited

Loading