Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u08b.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/d3ea4614496bae5919c5ce0df4d94bfa for a full test report.

The test report covers all apart from the 2016b and 2017a easyconfigs.

Right so this is probably the most controversial change. Though it isn't used as a dependency in other stuff much, someone still felt the need to update it to pretty recent GCCcore's, so i assume it's used by users in some way still?

Probably still alright to rename it i.m.h.o. to just get this issue over with

If we do the change the other way round (#17353) we alter fewer easyconfigs, but the libPSML capitalisation is also a dependency. These are recent enough easyconfigs that we cannot use the archive approach.

So, yes this is not a great option. However, I see no better one to avoid this libpsml / libPSML problem remaining.

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

I think the oldest ones here is to old for generoso as well

@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17359 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17359 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 10266

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

I think the oldest ones here is to old for generoso as well

whoops, looks like the oldest toolchain it has is 2018b...

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 19 out of 65 (10 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/89f0eb6085210317f2e7e21cbafeeb0c for a full test report.

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="libPSML-1.1.10-GCC-10.3.0.eb libPSML-1.1.10-GCC-10.2.0.eb libPSML-1.1.10-GCC-11.2.0.eb libPSML-1.1.10-iccifort-2020.4.304.eb libPSML-1.1.10-intel-compilers-2021.2.0.eb libPSML-1.1.10-intel-compilers-2021.4.0.eb ESL-Bundle-0.6.1-intel-2020b.eb ESL-Bundle-0.6.1-foss-2020b.eb"

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17359 EB_ARGS="libPSML-1.1.10-GCC-10.3.0.eb libPSML-1.1.10-GCC-10.2.0.eb libPSML-1.1.10-GCC-11.2.0.eb libPSML-1.1.10-iccifort-2020.4.304.eb libPSML-1.1.10-intel-compilers-2021.2.0.eb libPSML-1.1.10-intel-compilers-2021.4.0.eb ESL-Bundle-0.6.1-intel-2020b.eb ESL-Bundle-0.6.1-foss-2020b.eb" EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17359 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 10270

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 6 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/615dc338c5b0f7648c309aaf34c1076c for a full test report.

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--filter-ecs=2016b,2017a"

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17359 EB_ARGS="--filter-ecs=*2016b*,*2017a*" EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17359 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 10273

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/f8187dce0983301a1d6db005ef69bbf9 for a full test report.

Going in, thanks @branfosj !