{*}[intel/2016.00] HPL 2.1 (REVIEW) by boegel · Pull Request #2209 · easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs

boegel · 2015-12-10T17:54:39Z

requires easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#751 and easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#773

wrapper PR for #1973 which includes https://github.com/DirkdeDraak/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/1, and list the components for icc/ifort to avoid a big fat installation that also includes mkl/tbb/ipp/etc

…HPL easyconfig for intel/2016.00

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-10T18:42:42Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5209/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-10T23:22:31Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 10 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/3ca11cfd71dd7d25dceb for a full test report.

edit: running two Intel installers at the same time on the same node is not a good idea...

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-10T23:32:45Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5220/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-10T23:39:06Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/0d14aabf37bccca520cd for a full test report.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-10T23:41:53Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5221/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

wpoely86 · 2015-12-11T09:38:34Z

I think you mean 2016a?

wpoely86 · 2015-12-11T09:39:21Z

the .* are not needed?

I also would add a comment where the full list can be found.

yes they are, we're using match, not search

ok on the comment

No, they are not needed. We only match, we don't use the result. The last regex should be intel-ipsc?_

without .*, match will not... match

Why wouldn't it?

import re >>> print re.match("intel-comp", "intel-comp-bla") <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x7f7d5e42d5e0> >>> print re.match("intel-comp.*", "intel-comp-bla") <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x7f7d5e42d648>

You start to own me a beer.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-11T22:27:57Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5235/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-11T23:15:20Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5238/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-11T23:27:48Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5239/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-12T02:13:22Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/a9f89973f642abcdff45 for a full test report.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-13T17:48:08Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5267/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-13T18:21:39Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/8b06d49aeadb7e39c215 for a full test report.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-13T18:31:31Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5270/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-13T18:31:54Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5274/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-13T18:50:16Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5273/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-14T10:33:03Z

as pointed out by @ocaisa in #2214, this should be GCCcore, and binutils should be included as well as a dep

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-14T16:52:56Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5300/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-14T18:05:29Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/808207b15196b8f9a9b8 for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-12-14T18:09:30Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/81da6347c3a3af031684 for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-12-14T22:15:13Z

Tested thoroughly on top of easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#756, good to go, thanks a lot @DirkdeDraak for your work on this!

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-14T23:41:49Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5319/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-14T23:42:54Z

And to @wpoely86 for the help in getting the IntelBase and EB_icc easyblocks up to speed. Going in!

{*}[intel/2016.00] HPL 2.1 (REVIEW)

fmasselink and others added 3 commits September 22, 2015 12:00

intel 2016 toolchain

a6f488d

removed site-specific lines for license file

07b07ab

use GCC 4.9.3 in intel/2016.00, stick to official tarball names, add …

7f0c734

…HPL easyconfig for intel/2016.00

boegel added this to the v2.5.0 milestone Dec 10, 2015

include component list in icc/ifort 2016.0.109 easyconfigs

56dfffd

boegel force-pushed the intel2016 branch from 2939c73 to 56dfffd Compare December 10, 2015 23:05

boegel mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2015

fall back to ALL as value for components for icc/ifort 2016.x (+ style fixes) wpoely86/easybuild-easyblocks#18

Merged

wpoely86 reviewed Dec 11, 2015
View reviewed changes

boegel changed the title ~~{*}[intel/2016b] HPL 2.1 (WIP)~~ {*}[intel/2016.00] HPL 2.1 (WIP) Dec 11, 2015

boegel added 3 commits December 11, 2015 22:30

fix remark

6756a59

reluctantly admit that @wpoely86 is right by dropping .*

739f0e9

if @wpoely86 says _, we do _

453ebe4

boegel mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2015

Added icc, ifort, iccifort 2016.0.109 files #1973

Closed

boegel added 2 commits December 13, 2015 18:08

use GCC/4.9.3-2.25 as base for intel/2016.00

423b3c3

include GCCcore and binutils as explicit deps in intel/2016.00

85aefae

boegel added 2 commits December 13, 2015 18:50

fix versionsuffix for binutils in intel/2016.00

81d104e

fix typo

1c21d6a

boegel changed the title ~~{*}[intel/2016.00] HPL 2.1 (WIP)~~ {*}[intel/2016.00] HPL 2.1 (REVIEW) Dec 13, 2015

boegel mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2015

EasyBuild 2.5.0 (roadmap) easybuilders/easybuild#170

Closed

16 tasks

boegel mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2015

{bundle}[dummy] GCC-4.9.3-2.25: bundle of GCCcore 4.9.3 and binutils 2.25 #2214

Merged

boegel reviewed Dec 14, 2015
View reviewed changes

use GCCcore+binutils as base for icc/ifort in intel/2016.00

5022127

boegel mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2015

update easyblocks for Intel tools to support 2016 versions easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#756

Merged

drop explicit dep on GCC in iccifort 2016.0.109 toolchain

e159312

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2015

Merge pull request #2209 from boegel/intel2016

7e61d04

{*}[intel/2016.00] HPL 2.1 (REVIEW)

boegel merged commit 7e61d04 into easybuilders:develop Dec 14, 2015

boegel deleted the intel2016 branch December 14, 2015 23:43

Conversation

boegel commented Dec 10, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 10, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 10, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 10, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 10, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 10, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Dec 11, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 Dec 11, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

wpoely86 Dec 11, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Dec 11, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

wpoely86 Dec 11, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Dec 11, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

wpoely86 Dec 11, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 11, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 11, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 11, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 12, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel Dec 14, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants