• Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This. This is exactly why people pick the guy in the Star Trek shirt.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Weird. I’ve called it “A New Hope” to differentiate it from the other movies since 1990 or so. At the beginning of the movie, when the words are scrolling, it says, “A New Hope.”

    • friedmag@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s kind of his point. The original release didn’t say that. The rerelease in 1978 did.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        The original release didn’t say “A New Hope” in that scrolling text at the beginning of the movie?!?

        • Saryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          No, it didn’t because at the time Lucas didn’t expect to make more movies. He did have the basics for a larger story on his head, but the first movie was made as a standalone, telling the middle part of a larger story. If i remember correctly, when the first movie was being made, Lucas hadn’t even decided that Vader would be Luke’s father. He thought of that after the movie’s success and when it became clear it would become a series.

          Edit: To finish the story - the title credits for the first movie were added later, after the original release, when it was clear that more movies would come out and that each one would need its own title. But before all of that, the first movie was simply titled “Star Wars”

          • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago


            As I remember it, the original title crawl did indeed say “Episode IV A NEW HOPE.” This was despite it being the first movie made – to give it the feeling of starting in the middle of a larger drama.

            When you went outside the Marquee said Star Wars. The VHS says Star Wars. But the movie calls itself STAR WARS Episode IV A NEW HOPE.

            Is this splitting hairs? Yes.

            EDIT. I was wrong. In 1977 there was no subtitle in the crawl because of FOX. In 1981, there was.

            The opening crawl in the first Star Wars film is very different from Lucas’s original intention. The original text, used in the rough cut he showed to friends and studio executives in February 1977, appears in the Marvel Comics adaptation of the film. When originally released in May 1977, the first film was simply titled Star Wars, as 20th Century Fox forbade Lucas to use a subtitle on grounds that it could be confusing, since there had been no other Star Wars movies prior to 1977.[2][10] In addition, it was not certain if the film would be followed with a sequel. When The Empire Strikes Back was released in 1980, the episode number, “Episode V”, and subtitle “THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK” appeared as the first two lines of the opening crawl.^[citation needed]^ To match its sequel’s crawl, the episode number “Episode IV” and subtitle “A NEW HOPE” were added for the film’s theatrical re-release in April 1981.

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Fox and now Disney made such a good job of erasing it from memory that it has been almost forgotten. But here in this video you can still see how it was back in 1977. Also, other very subtle stylistic choices on font, crawl movement, etc. that were changed for the re-releases. Modern streaming versions are also different from the ones originally on theaters.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Also Luke was “Starkiller” for most of the length of the development of the movie.

            The scene where Luke rescues Leia from the jail, they filmed it with him being called “Luke Starkiller”. Here’s Mark Hamill himself telling the story.

            https://youtube.com/shorts/w3pvz7rM48Y

            Also, don’t you mean before that, titled “The Star Wars”? (I honestly don’t know, but didn’t someone earlier say the original had “the” in the title?) (Edit oh yeah there is a comment saying that but it’s another thread on this same post, dk about the veracity)

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      No! And the reason I say no is because Greedo didn’t shoot at all! In some versions they both shoot and in some Han shoots first and in some second. In the one I grew up with (VHS box set, face edition) he is the only one to shoot.

    • Zagam@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, no. That green fucker never even had a chance to pull his trigger. Han capped him in the coldest of blood then sauntered out with less bothers than Winnie-the-Pooh with a tummy full of hunny.

      • red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I know. But back when Lucas first changed it, “Han shot first” was the slogan people used. It’s short, as slogans should be. What else would you use? “Greedo never shot”? “Only Han shot”? Those don’t sound as good, at least to me. “Han shot first” can also mean that Greedo never got to fire his gun, because Han was quicker. So I’ll stick with that.

        • Zagam@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I get you. I think my problem with Han Shot First is that it forgives the ret-con and I don’t want to do that. I’d rather be pedantic about it. But I have no hate to people that make the pithy Han Shot First comment, its better than Han shot in self-defense beccause Mos-Eisley is a stand your ground state.

      • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        God forbid a character start out as an asshole so he has room for character growth.

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          What I hate so much about the modern versions is that not only do they try to make him not a bad guy, but they out that stupid scene with Jabba in right after it. Narratively it serves the same purpose as the previous scene and the dialogue is nearly identical. Plus it really cheapens how big of a threat Jabba should be. Han steps on him. Jabba was throwing people into a pit just for shits and giggles. Why would he let someone step on him? Some scenes really should stay deleted.

    • Klear@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And he was so full of shit when talking about the Kessel run.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I finally found the original, un-fucked with Star Wars without all the Lucas edits and CGI. So much better than the crap they messed with.

    • Owl@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes

      Idk why they called it Christmas “special”, since it’s a single movie-

      • hansolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That was “The Ewok Adventure” and that was the only name it ever had. There was no caravan. There might have been some courage. It was Dollar Store Drew Barrymore, Dollar Store Luke, and Wicket selling VHS tapes and add spots on the ABC Sunday Night Movie of the Week spot in the 80s.

        I don’t know when this “Caravan of Courage” stuff started, but the VHS box I had as a kid didn’t say that at all.

  • username_1
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am SO old that I don’t actually remember their “additional names”. Star Wars… I don’t even remember the sequence… 4-5-6? I’m old enough to not care about that bullshit either.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I remember being utterly distraught after the first one came out and Lucas said it was the first of nine movies. The thought of having to wait that long to see them was a torment. And then I didn’t give a shit any more by the time Return of the Jedi came out; I only saw that one years later on VHS and I was like “why the fuck are muppets in this movie?” Have still never seen the prequels or the recent ones.

      • username_1
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Muppets? You mean those tiny bears near the end of the movie? Yeah, that was unnecessary comedy moment in the overall comedy adventure movie.

    • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Their “alliance” with the ewoks during the battle of endor definitely broke the prime directive.